Home - Editorial - POV - Masthead - Contact The Olive Press

phoeniciatimes.com designed and hosted by esopuscreek.com Contact the webmaster

Letters 10/22/2009

Dear Editor;
At the recent budget workshop and canidates debate session, October 17, 2009, there was much discussion and criticism of the Town of Olive Capital Reserve Accounts. These accounts were established and funds added to them from unexpended balances over a period of twenty plus years. These accounts are for specific expenditures; for example, if a building needed a new roof, it would be funded from the buildings account. They are not savings accounts to be spent on a rainy day. If an accident put a cruiser out of commission, a new police car would come from the police account, and so on. By state law these accounts cannot be used for lowering the tax levy: they do, however, enable the town to continue to maintain its viability in these hard economic times without bonding and putting the town in debt. It is important to realize these accounts were funded through town revenues such as mortgage tax, sales tax and interest bearing accounts when the economy was good and there was extra revenue.
Because of economic hardships, all of this year's unexpended balance will be applied to reduce the tax levy and not be put into capital reserves. Thank goodness, we will be able to reduce the preliminary budget without balancing it on the backs of employees and first responders or by rescinding contracts made in good faith as was proposed by others who are new to the budget process.
Bert Leifeld, Supervisor
Bruce La Monda, Deputy Supervisor

Dear Editor,
This is for the citizens of the Town of Olive:
I want to say thank you to my community and to my constituents for permitting me to serve during the past 16 years as Town Councilman. I have always felt that the entire complement of the Town of Olive residents were my constituents. And I thank you all for letting me be part of the Town Board. I have tried hard to keep all points of view in mind. Everyone has a way of seeing his or her world - and it is important for each of us on the Town Board to try to understand the various viewpoints.
So many times I have said to others that I am so lucky to be part of a Town Board that works very well together. No matter our personal differences and no matter who has sat on the Board, we always have been able to come to a solution that we feel benefits the Town and permits us as individuals to work together as a whole. I am so grateful for the opportunity and I will miss the camaraderie we have felt through the years.
I feel it important to reiterate that it was my fault that I was not nominated for an additional term. When the Democratic Caucus was held, I had alerted individuals that I would not be at the Caucus because of family business. I was the only family member who had a flexible schedule and could travel out of state. Once I left Ashokan, I became very focused on the work waiting to be done and I totally forgot about assigning someone to nominate me at the Caucus. It was only after I returned and I found a phone message from a newspaper reporter and a message from the newly nominated candidate Linda Burkhardt that I realized what had just happened. I regret that this happened, because I would have liked to have been able to continue the work that I have been actively involved in.
There are several Town projects, which the Town’s people are probably only slightly aware of, that will have future impact on the Town. I would like to be able to continue as a volunteer representing the Town. Of course, everyone is aware of the new sewerage treatment plant in Boiceville. In addition, once the State budget crisis evens out, we may see special money coming to that area for revitalization. We also have a very small amount of funding - shared among the seven municipalities - to begin a process of visioning for the Boiceville area and for the entire Route 28 corridor through Olive. The Central Catskills Collaborative (made up of the seven municipalities from Hurley to Andes) is currently working towards creating a Route 28 Scenic Byway from West Hurley all the way out to Andes. Soon a citizens working group will need to be created in Olive to help with the process of putting together our segment of a corridor management plan for the Scenic Byway. I have taken the responsibility for managing this effort within the Town of Olive and I hope to be able to continue it. Plus I have been given a leadership role within the Collaborative as Chairman for the next six months, after which the Chairmanship will shift to Fleischmanns. Each Town (or Village) is responsible for defining what is important for that municipality - for instance, what makes the Town of Olive special - its history, its culture, its geology, its scenic attributes. We are working with State agencies to assist with the process of creating a Scenic Byway. This is a very positive project, which will let us in Olive focus on what we want to convey to travelers through our Town. Another project that awaits the release of State funding is the building of a picnic park in Ashokan. We are part of the Lower Esopus Watershed Project (the lower Esopus includes the area below the Ashokan high dam all the way to Saugerties) and also the Esopus Management Plan for the Upper Esopus (this include the area of the Esopus Creek above the Ashokan Reservoir). I have enjoyed my involvement in all these projects and I sincerely hope that I will be allowed to continue to somehow represent the Town of Olive in the work that remains to be accomplished.
Allow me an opportunity to do some analysis on the make-up of a Town Board. I do not want anyone to take my comments as being from a feminist viewpoint. However, there are different ways that men and women work. There is a lot of work that goes into being an active participant on the Board. Women often see issues in a broader light and may be better prepared to reconcile differences when there are communication problems. Women are worker bees. I know that I have a proclivity to get immersed in what interests me. And I saw this in both Cindy Johansen and Linda Burkhardt - both of whom I enjoyed working with. And I do want to say that I appreciate the care that Rita Vanacore put into the School Board - she is another hard worker and much to be admired. We have two very qualified women candidates. Bottom line - it is important that there be at least one woman on the Board. I have worked with Linda, so I can say definitively that she is a hard worker - and that means a great deal to me to see that someone is willing to pull his or her own weight. She was effective when she was last on the Board and I expect that she will be equally or more so, given another opportunity.
From my perspective, we have a very fine and capable Town Board. Whenever one new member has come on board, we have found the change to be workable and sometimes even refreshing. A mass movement to change the makeup of the Town Board will also change the dynamics we have worked hard to achieve in our relationship with New York City and the Department of Environmental Protection. Please vote wisely and not with an attitude of change for change’s sake. The current Town Board has achieved wonders over the past few years and is to be congratulated for keeping the Town on an even keel and with a good budget process.
Thank you very much, everyone. And remember to VOTE on November 3.
Helen K. Chase
Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,
Following the Town budget meeting on Tuesday, October 13, I urge Town of Olive citizens to vote for a new Town Supervisor (Barringer), Town Boards people (Van Buren and Grazier), a new Highway Superintendant (Scofield) and a new Town Justice (Van Kleeck) on Tuesday, November 3. There were at least four startling revelations of mismanagement by the current Town Supervisor, Berndt Leifeld, and his rubber-stamp Town Board.
First, discussion of a two percent tax hike this year would be outrageous; of a five percent hike beyond belief. That the Democrats have been discussing a nine percent hike, even if exaggerated as a campaign ploy, is unthinkable. When social security benefits have not been increased; when many are out of work; and when few if any have received raises, to discuss raising taxes over nine percent, a move that could force elderly Olive residents to sell their homes and demolish property values, is arrogant and incompetent.
Second, a private citizen noted a sixty percent differential between spending and amount budgeted on health insurance. Although the Board had glib explanations, it appears that large sums in the six digit range have been moved from one account to another without public discussion or scrutiny.
Third, when I asked the Town Board to make public the variances between actual spending on specific items and the amount disclosed to the public in the Town budget, Town officials essentially told me that I was asking rude questions and should keep quiet.
Fourth, the Town Supervisor has repeatedly stated that because unionized employees in the Highway Department have received a four percent raise, all other Town employees must receive the same raise, even though taxpayers have mostly received no or smaller raises, and social security recipients have not received any. I ask you to put on your economist's cap. What is the incentive effect on negotiation strategy if the Town Supervisor starts with the assumption that raises for all Town employees are dependent on the raise to which he agrees to the other party, which is supposed to be at arm's length? The incentive is to breach the duty of good faith bargaining and give the other party as high a raise as possible, since your own raise depends on the raise you give to the other side. Mr. Leifeld has created this perverse incentive.
It is time for a change. Olive needs transparency and competent management. As a member of the Town of Olive Republican Committee, I urge you to vote Republican this year.
Mitchell Langbert, Ph.D.
West Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,
...And fellow citizens here in the Town of Olive. It is time to set the record straight!
Regarding the upcoming local election, I find it very discouraging to read and hear a number of inaccurate and misleading articles and letters to the editor. For one example, it is unfair to blame our current leadership for all the trees that were cut due to the reconstruction of route 28-A. The City of New York was simply responding to being "PUT ON NOTICE" at the Lemon Squeeze Rally. Looks like we got more than we bargained for, oh and please refresh my memory, who led that rally ?
One of my personal friends and neighbors has written that it is time for change here in Olive. I have no problem with change if something better is available, but change just for the sake of change does not make good common sense. Would you choose someone to perform open heart surgery on you instead of a real doctor because the person had watched "Scrubs" on television?
Above and beyond writting letters to the editor, as a musician and songwriter, I have written a song titled, "Don't Fix It, If It ain't Broke". I have been invited to perform it at the annual senior luncheon at the Boiceville Inn scheduled for Oct 29 at noon until 2 p.m. The luncheon is brought to you by your Democratic candidates and hosted by John and Barbara Parete.
In conclusion we have a highly, experienced town government, why mess with it? No sporting event can be won without team work, and that is what we already have - a team! Supervising a town, making informed decisions, maintaining our roads, and officiating a court of law all come with the need for previous knowledge and experience in the field.
Does Olive really want new voices at the table who haven't bothered to even attend Town Board meetings before they became candidates? I think not. Lets keep the varsity team working for us, this is not the time to bring in the inexperienced third string. "Don't Fix It, If It ain't Broke".
Ben Rounds
Olivebridge, NY

Dear Editor,
Although the Meet the Candidates in the Town of Olive was this past Saturday, I feel the need to make my platform known to all those who might be interested.....first, and foremost, my candidacy is not endorsed by any political party. Therefore, if elected, there will be no political agenda...any decision I must make will be based solely on the needs of the community as a whole.
These are the proposals, if elected, I would bring before the Town Council:
To create a budget finance committee composed of members of our town who are qualified to guide us in a fiscally responsible way creating a more efficient use of our town funds and to also help to create a long term strategic plan that would enhance and enrich our community endeavors.
To work with our local police, firefighters, and ambulance employees and volunteers creating and inplimenting an evacuation procedure. The Town of Olive plays host to one of the largest resivoirs in the state and we should be prepared for dam failure or attack.
To research community development grants and funding available from the federal or state governments
with the express purpose of improving and enhancing our town facilities.
To investigate the possibility of creating a community group health plan that could ease the burden of individual health benefit costs.
To remind our Town that the Large Parcel legislation is just sleeping....it is not dead...and we must continue to vocalize and initiate all efforts to put it to rest permanently.
Vigilance, dedication and the ability to think outside of the box and make decisions are qualities that I would bring to the table as a member of the Olive Town council.
Rita Vanacore
Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,
At the end of 2009 I will have served as your Town Clerk/Tax Collector/ Records Management Officer for 27 years. A personal thank you is extended to each and every Olive resident for bestowing upon me the distinct honor of forever being a part of the Town of Olive’s history. As most of you know, public access to government records and preservation of our town’s history is of major concern to me. I’m constantly saying, “An informed citizenry is the best guarantee of good government.” So, having attended hundreds of Town Board meetings and being the author of over 2,100 pages of Town Board Minutes I’d like to share factual information regarding changes the current administration has implemented.
West Shokan residents on the banks of the Bushkill are all too familiar with the need for flood control along this stream. With Berndt Leifeld as Supervisor and Linda Burkhardt and Bruce La Monda as Town Board members on March 8, 2007 the Bushkill Stream Emergency Project and debris clean up was implemented through a federal grant with the Town of Olive as project sponsor. Thanks to Berndt Leifeld’s diligent work with federal representatives, the Corps of Engineers and Ulster County Soil and Water there was no damage to private or public property along the Bushkill this summer during all the heavy rains. No town tax dollars were spent to rectify a critical flooding issue.
With Berndt Leifeld as Supervisor and Linda Burkhardt and Bruce La Monda as Town Board members Resolution #4 of 2003 was passed on May 6, 2003 establishing a Service Awards Program for the volunteer members of the Olive Fire Department, Inc. This resolution was subject to a mandatory referendum with the entire town supporting the service awards program at the polls in the fall. The program is geared to encourage and reward volunteerism thus avoiding the tremendous cost of a paid fire department. As homeowners and taxpayers we recognize the importance of our volunteer members and thank them for their service.
From 2004 to 2007 with Berndt Leifeld as Supervisor and Linda Burkhardt and Bruce La Monda as Town Board members numerous informational meetings regarding the Olive Sewer District in Boiceville were held. The Town Board agreed to participate in the project but opted to give the property owners within the district the final determination as to whether or not they wanted the facility. NYS law prohibits anyone from outside the district paying any tax dollars to the district. The property owners within the proposed district participated in a special election and on May 8, 2007 overwhelmingly voted to continue with the project. Funds in the amount of $12,278,000.00 were allocated from the Catskill Watershed Corporation (CWC) to build the facility. Further negotiations were held with the City of New York through the CWC resulting in NYC paying a substantial amount towards the operations and maintenance costs resulting in affordable rates for private property owners. This newly created district will allow for business expansion in Boiceville.
In 2001 with Berndt Leifeld as Supervisor and Linda Burkhardt and Bruce La Monda as board members the Town Board accepted bids for the Lester S. Davis Park swimming pool complex. Funds and grant moneys were received to reconstruct the existing swimming pool and to build new bath houses. An additional $12,000.00 budget item was received from the state to finish the parking lot and walkways in Davis Park. Highway Superintendent Jimmy Fugel used town equipment and manpower to oversee and complete the blacktopping project.
The fact should be addressed that Highway Superintendent Jimmy Fugel through proper budgeting and utilization of Capital Reserve accounts over the course of his past eight years has gradually upgraded Olive’s antiquated highway equipment. New equipment is ready to go in emergency snow events and tax dollars are saved in replacement parts and repairs.
Supervisor Berndt Leifeld is the elected 2nd Vice President of the Catskill Watershed Corporation which is a major source of funding for Olive residents. For the 2002 and the 2008 trials regarding the Ashokan Reservoir the CWC provided $1.435 million dollars in legal fees to the Towns of Olive and Hurley. In addition, individual full time property owners in Olive received $3,358,058.00 for septic system improvements, Olive businesses received $1,677,000.00 in economic development loans and grants, and $2,233,476.00 was received in storm water funds to stop erosion around streams. As member of the CWC board which approves all funding to watershed communities, Supervisor Berndt Leifeld has also represented us well.
One of the most important changes that has occurred in the Town of Olive in the past couple of years is the improved communications and working relationship with the City of New York. Supervisor Berndt Leifeld and Board Member Bruce La Monda worked tirelessly to receive a firm commitment from NYC that no road closures would occur during the city’s bridge and road reconstruction project. Perhaps the most historic change occurring under Supervisor Berndt Leifeld’s administration is that we now have a settlement with NYC with an agreed upon assessment of the Ashokan Reservoir. As the legal funds that were previously available from the CWC are now exhausted, this settlement will save Town of Olive residents millions in legal and appraisal fees.
We have proven leadership in the Town of Olive and I’m proud to be a part of that team.
Sylvia Rozzelle
Olive Town Clerk

Dear Editor,
Unfortunately I was unable to attend last Saturdays Town of Olive meet the candidates event so I am not fully informed of the various candidates qualifications and platforms at this time. I believe that all of the candidates are good people with the Town of Olive's best interests at heart.
I do believe that Rita Vanacore is an excellent choice for Town Board due to her demonstrated willingness to work very hard for Olive. She spent approximately 30 hours a week working for us as a member of the Onteora School Board and was instrumental in helping to derail the enactment of the so called Large Parcel Law during her tenure on that board. She also spent much time and effort serving on the Town of Olive Large Parcel Review Board. Rita has repeatedly demonstrated the willingness and ability to put in the hours and do the research needed to arrive at a well informed opinion. In my view she will add a lot of value to our Town and will be an excellent addition to the Town Board.
Sincerely,
Charlie Blumstein
Olivebridge, NY

Dear Editor,
I am a senior citizen who still has the ability, knowledge and wisdom to be able to see the real man behind the talk. My wife Rita and I have known Tim and Rebecca for over five years and during this time I have witnessed first, a father who loves his family, second a lawyer who is professional and forthright, and third, a Town Justice who is very knowledgeable about the Penal Law and Code of Criminal Procedure as well as the Vehicle and Traffic Laws. A Town Justice is a position that should be held in high esteem, a seat that should be given to a professional with a criminal or law background, a person who by all standards will do the job to the best of his ability, and have the guts to excuse himself if one of the parties is a neighbor or friend. This is why I am hoping your readers will vote for Mr Tim Cox for Town Justice. Please remember this word,
"IMPARTIAL" The vote should not go to a person who has a lot of friends and they all get along together, this causes mistrials and cases thrown out of court. The vote should go to a knowledgeable candidate who has the background, education, law degree and understanding of what a Felony, Misdemeanor, or Traffic offense in Lieu of arrest means. I strongly believe this person is Tim Cox.
Thank You for reading this article.
Peter G. Polis
Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,
This year's Olive election has become electrified by the fact that we have a full slate of candidates from which to choose. One candidate for town council who has earned our vote is Rita Vanacore. She possesses the qualities which qualify her for this important position.
First, she is a true public servant. For three years she gave her time and resources to represent us on the Onteora Central School board. Rita devoted about thirty hours per week to the school district at what was often a thankless job, and for which she received NO monetary compensation. She was always well prepared no matter how complex or controversial the issue. When she is elected to our town board we will receive the same exemplary dedication.
Second, she has a quiet, nonthreatening demeanor which is what we need from our representatives. She is an excellent listener who genuinely is concerned about her constituents. If you bring a concern or consideration to Rita you'll be given her complete attention as well as her total respect. If she doesn't agree with you she'll explain why, but she'll never scream at you or try to shout you down. She works well with others, and this is absolutely an essential attribute for a town board member.
Third, she is thorough. When she undertakes a challenge she diligently researches the issue until she discovers the best solution. Rita also has an uncanny ability to gain the utmost assistance from our state and federal representatives. During these most difficult economic times, we must take advantage of grants and all other sources funding which are available.
Fourth, she has boundless energy. While serving on the school board, she also attended many Olive Matters meetings to learn all she could about the Large Parcel law. Anyone who paid taxes in Olive during 2004 may recall the headlines of the Olive Press, "TOWN RESIDENTS IN TEARS OVER TAX HIKES." The school board's decision to invoke the law resulted in a 59 percent tax hike for us. When the county legislature followed suit, some Olive residents saw their taxes increase by $10,000. While we were still reeling from this injustice, Rita and several other Olive women became candidates for the school board. Olive voters wisely elected them and we were rewarded when they successfully defeated other attempts of the board to reenact the Large Parcel in subsequent years. It was intelligent and beneficial for Olive to elect Rita then; it is wise to elect her on November 3rd.
Finally,and most important, she is willing to go the extra mile to represent us. When passed over by the major parties in her effort to gain the nomination, she created her own party, the Olive Branch, and garnered the necessary signatures on her petitions to gain access to the ballot. By this action she has proven how important the council woman position is to her. Many would have given up; Rita formed her own party.I appreciate her desire to represent us, and when she is elected we will be represented by one of
the most determined, organized, and energetic people I know. She will be one of the finest council members Olive has ever had.
Therefore I am voting for Rita Vanacore. I assure you that issues like the ugly Large Parcel law, which slipped in to devastate our town,will not pass through under Rita Vanacore's vigilant watch. I observed the reams of documents she reviewed and studied each week while serving us on the school board. She will do her job; she will save us money, and she will perform the duties of town council person in the most ethical, honorable and respectful manner. Please vote for the only independent candidate on the ballot on November 3rd. Vote for Rita Vanacore.
John R. Tisch
West Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,
I am writing to very strongly advocate on behalf of Timothy Cox, Candidate for Re-Election as Olive Town Justice. Since being elected Olive Town Justice almost four years ago Tim Cox has distinguished himself as a Fair and Impartial Judge closing approximately 600 cases each year. From 1996 to 1999 Judge Cox worked as the Assistant Clerk for the busiest civil court in the State of Connecticut. Tim has won the Trust and Admiration of his fellow Town and Village Judges in Ulster County, they elected him Vice President and 2010 President Elect of the Ulster County Magistrates Association. Judge Cox has a Bachelors Degree in Criminal Justice from SUNY-Plattsburgh and is a 1995 Graduate of Pace University Law School gaining a Juris Doctorate and Environmental Law Certificate. Tim Cox currently serves as Corporate Council for the Catskill Watershed Corporation (CWC) working for all 41 Watershed Towns. In his spare time (are you kidding me?) Tim Chairs the Pace University Environmental Law Alumni Advisory Council among other things. I’m proud to call Tim Cox my Town Justice and I’m sure his educational background and experience do the same for you. Re-Elect Timothy Cox Olive Town Justice.
Edwin J. Maldonado
Krumville, NY

Dear Editor,
I served with Linda Burkhardt on the Town of Olive Board for four years. In the election two years ago, she missed being elected, and for two years now she has, without pay or title, continued to serve Olive as Recreation Committee Chairperson and as a town Committeeman. Linda and her husband Fred attend every Town Board meeting to keep up with what is going on in local government. Conversely, three other Town Board candidates only showed up after they became candidates for this election.
Linda is a worker. I believe she was the victim of misinformation whispered and telephoned in the past election. Linda is and was a firm supporter of the highway and emergency services in their negotiations. Rumors otherwise may have caused voters to vote with their ears and not their open minds. Putting Linda Burkhardt back on the Town Board would be putting a valuable and dedicated worker back on a team who has Olive, not politics, in mind.
Henry Rank
Town of Olive Councilman

Dear Editor,
Vote for Vanacore...As a long time friend of Rita Vanacore, I am greatly encouraged that she is running for Olive Town Council. I have been on committees with her and found her to be open minded, fiscally responsible, a problem solver, respectful and a good listener; working with both large and small groups. Rita is always committed to finding the right answer through research and dedication. I know that she has great ideas to economically stimulate our town and will be an active community member. I look forward to having her represent the Town of Olive.
Karen Hicinbothem
Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,
When it comes to politics the shrill call for change often preceded profound regrets. History is rife with examples.
To those who have been or will become the beneficiaries of the stewardship of the Town of Olive lead by its seasoned supervisor, Berndt Leifeld, I would urge some careful contemplation before the coming election.
So much of the quality of life in this town that many take for granted can be so drastically affected by powerful political interests beyond our control. It is so important that we maintain the kind of leadership and hard work that has been provided by Berndt Leifeld. Time and again Mr. Leifeld has successfully advocated, negotiated, and managed our interests by being capable, tough, and respectful in the right measure. And in doing so he has consistently gained the respect and good will of those at the other end of the table.
Being a strong negotiator without making enemies, when it counts, is key
John Shively
West Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,
In a small town it seems there is a personal nature to an election that is unfortunate and I think unwise.
When voting for your personal interests means not voting for people you are friendly with and have happily done town business with, an election challenge to incumbents can be misinterpreted as a personal affront. But is that wise?
When voting I disavow "feelings" and assess the best economic choice that serves my fiscal well being. I swear I would vote against my own son if I thought he was going to raise my taxes. "Sorry, kid."
The team challenging our Town of Olive incumbents are running on the Republican and Conservative lines this year.
They have made a commitment to a hiring freeze and a frozen budget. They will actually refuse the health care package and will not take a health care buyout.. Vince Barringer, running for supervisor, will take a ten thousand dollar pay cut as well. I really appreciate that.
Because the Republican / Conservative candidates are making a clear commitment to thrift at their own personal cost, I am convinced that this year I should vote the Republican Conservative ticket for the first time.
By the way, these candidates will require a town board majority to halt the growing town budget burden.
These are new and scary times. We New Yorkers will soon pay a huge government mandated obligation to make up the pension shortfall of the New York State employees. Spam and water for dinner anyone? The tax burden we face will be enormous and will threaten the home ownership of those who live on the fiscal edge. Federal spending on the "Stimulous Package" has lowered our dollar index value from 99 to 75 in the past eight months. Yikes, there goes the buying power of the American dollar.
When I vote for Vince Barringer and the rest of the Republican/Conservative ticket November 3rd., I will not be voting against anyone. I will be voting for my economic survival.
Glenda Rose McGee
Olivebridge, NY

Dear Editor,
I would like to address the voting body of the Town of Olive. I have kept a low profile for all these years, but now I feel compelled to put a few thoughts on paper for you to consider. I will not throw darts or badmouth or even praise any one person. I will only discuss common sense and practical opinions that I have about the upcoming election. Change seems to be the theme lately. There's change at the Federal and State levels of government. Do we also need change at the local level of government? If you are truly satisfied with the manner in which the town board is running the town and handling your money, then why change a good thing. Just as the old saying goes, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
We are all intelligent people and know that our tax base is still one of the lowest in the county. Our recreation Department is one of the most cost efficient and friendly you will find anywhere. I would like everyone to take a little time and reflect on the positive changes throughout the Town over the last few years.
Change is a good thing if done in a wise manner. This is a challenging time for any Town Board. Let's keep a proven Board in place. Remember sometimes actions speak louder than words. Not all promises can be met. What seems promising now may not be important in our future. Blanket statements should be met with questions rather than blind agreement. Use your common sense when making that decision behind the voting curtain this election day.
BJ Leifeld Jr
Boiceville, NY

Dear Editor,
Linda Burkhart is one of the most caring individuals we have ever had the pleasure to know. Her concern for the people in her community extends widely in all directions. Anyone who can raise five wonderful children all of whom are productive solid citizens and still have time for her neighbors and her grandchildren is amazing and a valuable asset to any community.
Linda’s leadership goes far. Her long list of accomplishments; getting Time Warner to increase their coverage in Olive, parcel legislation, replacing the pool and especially the negotiations with NYC on the Reservoir assessment etc. is a strong indication of how she will continue to serve and plan for the people of Olive. She has served on the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Recreation Committee as Chair, the Ulster County Youth Board, the Olive Town Board and the Shandaken Theatrical Society to name a few.
Vote for Linda, she has the experience, the skills and the heart to work for the Town of Olive and its residents.
Cathy Magarelli & Sam Magarelli
Woodstock, NY

Dear Editor,
It was a surprise to read the Democratic party's achievements in their recent ad in your newspaper. Especially surprising was where they took credit for CREATING the Senior Art and Exercise Programs. True, the town FUNDS it, but the Democrats definitely did Not CREATE it.
Judith Boggess of Shokan is the brain-child behind the creation of the Senior Art and Exercise Program. It was through my son, Peter Friedel, and my presentation to the Town Board that brought this highly successful and valuable senior program to the board's attention. True, Ms.Burkhardt was then a town councilwoman and also on the Recreation Board. She presented the merits of the program to the Rec.Board, but she did Not CREATE the Senior Recreation Program. I believe in giving credit where credit is due.
Sandy Friedel
West Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,
I have been active in town government for the past thirty-five years. I have served on boards and committees with both supervisor candidates. I feel I should speak out in support of the current Town Board who has successfully negotiated with NYC to determine an acceptable assessment of the Ashokan Reservoir. Negotiating rather than threatening has enabled us to keep roads open while bridges get repaired.
We have a recreation program that is second to none. Our roads are kept in shape and plowed efficiently. Our courts operate without controversy. The town office is a welcoming place staffed with men and women chosen for their abilities, not their political affiliation. Look at our committees. We have a supervisor who asks, “Can you do the job?” not “Are you a Democrat or Republican?”
Look to the towns surrounding Olive. Olive has the stable and experienced team of leaders who cooperate for their citizens, not for their egos. Let’s keep Olive “The best little town by a dam site!”
Donald Beesmer
Olivebridge, NY

Dear Editor,
I have known Earla Van Kleek for many years and there is no doubt in my mind that she is the better candidate for Town Justice. Earla knows the community; knows the Town: and has worked extensively with youth-at-risk. Unless you go to Albany or New York City, you would not find a Justice better qualified to work with our troubled youth, misdemeanor charges and the kinds of cases that are presented in our town.
Olive does not need a corporate lawyer who does not understand the real world. Rather it needs someone with commitment to justice seasoned with compassion and common sense.
Katherine Maki
Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,
As the former Ulster County Elections Commissioner, I am writing to inform voters how to vote for a candidate at large for the office of Town Council. All other elected positions are in a head-to-head race, but TOWN COUNCILMEN run AT LARGE. This means that any two people can be selected, from any party and from any line, to fill the two seats on the Town Board. The top two vote-getters earn the two seats.
In a previous election, I received calls after the votes were tallied to complain that voters thought that names placed over each other on the ballot meant that you could only vote for one of the two. Not true.
Especially in this election where there are five candidates: Bruce La Monda, Linda Burkhardt, Craig Grazier, Don Van Buren, and Rita Vanacore. Not only are there five candidates, those candidates’ names might appear on five different lines: Democratic, Republican, Conservative, Open Government Party, and the Olive Branch Party. The voter can choose ANY TWO no matter if they oppose each other above, below, beside, or kitty-cornered. A voter can vote on any line as long as they choose only TWO candidates.
Be an informed voter. Exercise your right as an American.
John Parete
Boiceville, NY

Dear Editor,
I am writing in support of Don Williams campaign for County Court Judge.
When Don Williams announced his candidacy for judge I was excited because I know Don and what he has to offer. He has been a strong leader while serving as district attorney of Ulster County for the past 8 years. His dedication shines through his service and involvement in the community. He makes tough, independent decisions based on the law and common sense. Don listens to the concerns of citizens and keeps the best interest of the community at heart.
Don truly wants justice for individuals and the community. As a judge, Don would preside over a variety of criminal and civil matters. Because of Don’s experience as district attorney, he knows when to make jail or prison sentence recommendations. He is not afraid to stand up for what is right. His experience as district attorney has exposed him to a variety of types of cases. Don has the ability to look at situations objectively, and that is what justice is all about. He has always advocated for our most vulnerable citizens , children and the victims of domestic violence.
He is an advocate for those who may not have a voice or the courage to stand up for their rights. He is compassionate and understanding in his dealings.
Difficult cases of all types are brought before a judge on a daily basis. Judges are charged with following the law and making decisions accordingly. Many times those decisions can be unpopular with certain individuals or groups, but those decisions have to nonetheless be made.
Don Williams has had experience making those decisions, many times envisioning the criticism and fallout that will follow. But those decisions are made and he faces them with the conviction.
Don has worked hard on important issues like reducing domestic violence and improving the lives of children and youth in Ulster County. As director of Family Domestic Violence Services, I have witnessed first hand his sensitively when dealing with battered women and the empathy he has for survivors of Domestic Violence.
Don has a wonderful family that he is devoted to. He knows what is important.
I for one would be proud to have Don Williams as our next Ulster County Judge and know that battered women in the county would breathe a sigh of relief to know we have a judge who not only understand the complex dynamics of Domestic Violence but also truly cares about justice being served.
He is an intelligent, thoughtful person of conscience and will make a fine judge. Please support Don Williams for County Court Judge.
Kathleen Welby- Moretti
Woodstock, NY

Dear Editor,
Last week I visited the County Clerk's office to obtain a copy of the deed to my house. While I was there I noticed that the second floor of the building was decked out like a museum. Hanging in the hallway were rows and rows of pictures drawn and painted by area 4th grade students. Portraits of Henry Hudson and drawings of his ship were just some of the pieces of artwork. The creativity shown by these kids was amazing to me. It looked as if they were really embracing the history and not just reading about something boring from a textbook.
I stopped in to tell the Clerk that I thought the exhibit was fantastic and that I wished my own kids could have been there to see the posters. Luckily, she was able to provide me with a color booklet that had pictures of each drawing that I could take home with me to show my son and daughter. She also gave me two workbooks for each of them entitled "Archives for Kids" and "Biographies for Kids". Many thanks to the Clerk's Office and to area schools for making learning fun and getting our children involved in the community.
Maryann F. DeGroodt
Kingston, NY

Dear Editor,
People are quick to complain when something goes wrong, but how many of us are willing to take the time to give credit where credit is due when something goes right? Recently I went to the DMV to register my car. What I expected was not what I got.
I had been having a terrible day at work and the last thing I wanted to do on my lunch hour was stand in line. I was pleasantly surprised when I saw that there was no longer a line in which to wait. In its place was a machine dispensing tickets and some benches where I could sit and wait for my number to be called. In less than 5 minutes I was at the window and the very pleasant woman who waited on me made the transaction quick and painless.
Thinking back to previous trips I have made to the DMV, I can honestly say that the process has never been so smooth. I certainly hope that they continue to be that smooth in the future.This ticketing system is a great way to diffuse a potentially stressful situation. I think all public offices should consider getting one.
Tiffany Sauers
Kingston, NY

Dear Editor,
SHAME ON THE ONTEORA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION (OTA)!!! In these difficult economic times they are going to put out such an absurd media campaign. First the buttons…” United we teach”, Then the recent “Picketing”, to the Ridiculous Crisis center on Rte. 28 (How many signs do the need to let their members know where the building is), now the recent letter threatening a job action. Each one of these ploys is to gain sympathy for them from the unknowing public and the students. Recently my elementary age children and their friends were talking about the proposed “Job Action”, and made the following statement;
“…the teachers are going on strike…yea they don’t even care about the families.”
From the mouths of babes!
It is important to note that I do not have any problem with a union representing a group, the right for that union to have a contract, the right for that union to expect good faith bargaining, and the right for that member to expect its representatives to represent them and their interests. That being said, let’s look at some facts:
1. The OTA is currently under contract. The most recent “negotiated” contract expired June 30, 2008. The OTA’s above referenced contract contains a provision that is found on page 1 Article II paragraph one that states; “This agreement will be automatically renewed on an annual basis after the expiration date herof”….The contract expired on 6-30-08 and automatically rolled over for another year. That year came and went and the contract rolled over for another year and will expire on 6-30-10. If a new contract is not finalized it will roll over for another year. This could continue until a new agreement is finally agreed upon.
2. The Onteora Teachers Association falls under the regulations of the Taylor law, which governs labor relations for public employees. (The following web link will provide the information confirming the following information http://www.goer.state.ny.us/CNA/bucenter/taylor.html)
3. The Taylor Law prohibits strikes by public employees it also defines and prohibits improper practices by public employers and public employee organizations.
4. During these rollover years, mentioned previously, the members of the union are receiving pay increases, maintaining their benefits as well as all of their previously negotiated terms and conditions. Based on the contract from 2003 to 2008, the MA 1 teacher (first year teacher with a Masters Degree) starting salary increased 15% or $7,239 during that contract term. As a teacher progressed over that same period that automatically received a pay increase by moving to the next level such as MA 1, MA 2 etc. As an example The MA 1 teacher starts at $46,668 and progresses to the 5th year, there salary in the 5th year is $59,374. (this does not include a “bump for achieving tenure at the conclusion of year 3) This represents a salary increase of almost 28% or $12,926 over 5 years simply for not getting fired.
5. Upon the expiration of the original contract, the 5th and final year rolls over so the MA 1 teacher will become an MA 6 teacher with a salary of $60,908. That same teacher is now currently an MA 7 teacher with a base salary of $63,996.
Now for my opinion… During the past 2 years I cannot believe that some sort of offer has not already been placed on the table by the District. Did the rank and file of OTA see or hear of any offers? If not…why? If so did they want more? If it was lower than the 3.75% increase they are getting now, why not sit back and ride the current annual extensions. If any member of the OTA thinks that in this economic climate they are going to get more, I would classify them as delusional. I certainly hope that the district is NOT offering anything more than that is in their current contract. I would demand that the district representatives expect the OTA to give back some of the things they gained in their last contract such as a greater contribution to their health insurance. They currently contribute only 5% of the premiums while the rest of the world contributes 30% or more. Or surrender the cash incentive should their spouse have medical insurance at their job, this cash payment is as much as $2,400. Another area to look at is the sick leave clause. Currently the can accumulate sick days. The rest of us typically have a use it or lose it policy where we work. While they accumulate sick days, of which they get 17 days per year, they can take a cash payment for as many as they want after they accumulate 75 days. So if a teacher who gets 17 days per year, uses 5 days each year will accumulate 12 days per year. In 8 years they can cash in 96 days at a rate of $53 each for a total of $5,088…compliments of the tax payer!
The current contract is a pretty sweet deal all by itself. Considering the current economic situation where employment in Upstate NY as of July is 7.9%, the average Household (usually includes2 people) income as of 2007 is $66,256. Considering all of this, why is the OTA leadership making so much noise? The only answer I can come up with is GREED, and we thought Big Oil and Big Banking were greedy!!!! If that is the case, SHAME ON THEM. Instead of all this grandstanding, provide us with some details of what you want. I am not interested in hearing the he said/she said garbage or the finger pointing; GIVE US SOME DETAILS if you want our support.
Let me make perfectly clear I am not angry with any individual teacher, administrator or board member, however; I am very angry with the actions of the OTA as a whole. There recent ploys are a blatant attempt to gain sympathy and support from the public. They seem to have forgotten what their real job is…Teaching our children. The Board cannot go unscathed. Their inability to act decisively on anything much less complicated contract negotiations, is evident. They seem to be focused on other less controversial, matters and are only concerned with their own self interests rather than setting a clear vision for the ENTIRE district.
David Patterson
West Hurley, NY

Dear Editor,
As I read a long rambling letter from a self-professed English teacher who took no small amount of cheap shots at this woman named Vanacore, I was struck by the hostile tone of righteous indignation as the teacher smugly intoned that since 26% of the population possesses Bachelor's degrees, that they are somehow above the other lowly wretches. As I read on in disbelief, the educator went on to say that the standards of teaching are strictly enforced by a group of overseers who make sure that tenured teachers don't lapse into comfortable mediocrity. Well this really hit a sour chord with me because I know it to be untrue. I personally know of a district elementary school teacher who has dulled or destroyed countless musically gifted children by substandard teaching and poor attendance. I complained to the principal via letters and had a meeting, but to no avail. I was told that there was nothing to be done because the teacher had tenure. He is still there today destroying future minds. So after realizing the fallacy of that statement I read on to the next benediction about how hard working the teachers are in our district. Well I am very pleased to hear such a statement of dedication from our educators. That's why they are paid so well in this serene, well-behaved part of New York. It would really be a remarkable case of self sacrifice if that same English teacher had to "drive 100 miles" to teach in one of New York's garbage-strewn bullet pocked cities. There the salary would be a lot less and the conditions quite a bit different - not nearly so many Bachelor degree holding parents.
Putting that letter aside, let's have a public discussion about the real issues. What are the teachers' demands? Are they saying that a 2% cost of living increase (from their old contract) is not enough? Why are their demands confidential? Why don't they publish their demands so when we see them picketing in front of the school we know what it's all about? Are they afraid of losing public support? Renting the building across the street from the school is an obvious stratagem to curry public sympathy. I'm sorry if I and everyone else I know didn't have the time to stop by the "Crisis Center" during working hours to get the details.
Lastly, as everyone knows, many of us are barely holding onto jobs, have already lost their jobs, have no health insurance, are scrambling to pay bills and are in danger of losing our homes. Those property owners who pay school taxes will soon become renters who pay no school tax. Do you really want to kill the goose that laid the golden egg? These are economically disastrous times for most of us. You are lucky if you have a safe, secure, well paying pensioned union position in this beautifully rural part of New York. Don't destroy the good will we have toward our teachers with unreasonable demands.
Catherine Cook
Shandaken, NY

Dear Editor,
I can not remember the last time that a Letter to the Editor made my blood boil as the letter from Ms. Bryan. We have freedom of speech, but to denigrate some one else ( Rita Vanacore for expressing her opinion) with such venom is totally unacceptable.
My husband and I are College educated (he being a retired executive from a major Corporation) almost needing a dictionary to decipher her exceedingly long ego massaging letter. Sadly, she was degrading a member of this community who has been trying through hard work and dedication to improve and advance the Town and School District...
I would like to inform Ms. Bryan that we poor "misinformed viewers" of Fox News and Bill O'Reilly are "Fair and Balanced" and also are willing to listen objectively to her opinion and perhaps find some value in her long EPISTLE...
Meanwhile, WE, the people who pay the bills, should feel properly chastised by a Person of Superior Intellect....
Hildy Meissner
Boiceville, NY

Dear Editor,
The Labor Relations Committee of the Ulster County Legislature has prepared a Local Law that will require all contractors in the county to have a license to perform “Home Improvement” work. The type of work that comes under the proposed law is very, very broad and includes – masons, blacktopping, roofing, landscaping, grading and excavation, carpentry, swimming pool construction and even includes the local handyman, etc., etc.
All contracts over $1,000.00 will require that the work be done by a county licensed contractor. The type of work covered is defined in the 27 pages of legalese of the proposed law and is very broad and all inclusive.
To oversee the proposed law a Board of 10 persons will be appointed - union representation on the “Control Board” is required. The “Control Board” will have the power to draft the test required, determine the qualifications and experience necessary to obtain a license, set the types and amounts of insurance required by the contractor and may require the contractor to have a Bond – very expensive and difficult, if not impossible, for a small contractor to obtain. All work covered under the proposed law will require a detailed written contract – the law defines the content and form of the required contract. No longer will work be done on a “handshake” basis.
This law, if enacted, will drive many small contractors and tradesman out of business and make work covered by the proposed law more expensive for the homeowner. Not the way to go during these difficult economic times.
The law is anti-business and anti-consumer – it is a law that is designed to eliminate the small contractor and allow only the larger contractor to meet the terms of the law necessary to obtain the required license. Violation of sections of the law can result in a fine and imprisonment.
The myriad of rules and regulations is much too complex to cover in this letter. I would urge all contractors and tradesman to learn about this law and discuss the details (the devil is in the details) of the law with the candidates who are running for the position of County Legislator this November. Now is the time, prior to the election, to learn the position of each candidate before voting for members of the County Legislature.
William West
Woodstock, NY

Dear Editor,
Imagine that your house was severely destroyed by a natural or manmade disaster. You still own the land, and the foundation is still in tact, but the roof is destroyed, the basement is flooded, all appliances - destroyed, trees have fallen on the building and the ground is mud. For some reason, you find out that insurance will not cover your damages, and you are barely holding onto your job. There is no way that you can afford to put your home back together. Now, a contractor, whom you know as "the best in the area", comes to you and says he'll fix it, at no cost to you. He'll try to work with you, but you both agree that he has the final decision on how to best use his expertise to return your home to you, and it may take some time.
You would like to have a working kitchen, but since winter is coming, he choses to begin by getting a safe roof in place. You'd also like to have your bathtub back, but he found snakes in the basement, and decided to clear them out, before even getting your plumbing back in order. All the while, you're complaining to him, and more frequently about him, to your friends and neighbors. When he goes out to pick up supplies, he runs into unfriendly people. He continues to do what he knows is right, keeping his focus on repairing your home for you before winter sets in.
This is my analogy: Our President is the Contractor, the Right Wing nuts are the snakes in the basement, and the Democrats are - YOU - his former loyal supporters. OK. He's not giving everything that we've lost back to us in the first year. Did we really think that he could take the train wreck that was left to him from the previous 8 years, and turn it around to everyone's satisfaction in the blink of an eye? Do we know what he's facing now that the corrupt and evil place, formerly called the People's government, has been taken over? Can we even imagine what it's like to have to deal with the powers that be? Did we really believe that he could say: "I'm tearing down everything that's in place and building it from scratch"? That was an un-realistic dream. Our President needs us behind him. He needs to let the powers know that he has strong support from US. They know about "Divide and Conquer" and they are winning on that premise. On Monday, they (the Insurnace Companies), threatened to raise the average insurance rate if a public option bill is passed. If we stand around and complain about Obama not being tough enough, wouldn't it be more useful to understand why he's moving cautiously?
He needs us to make it clear to the opposition, that we are behind him. If we don't, We, the People will lose. We won't be able to blame it on Obama folks. We can take this one on ourselves. If our country fails, it will be our fault.... not the Republicans, not the Corporate crooks, but We, the Democrats, for being spoiled brats. Let's put our noses to the grindstone and speak out. We all want a public option, let's let the Insurance Companies know that we do, and more importantly, let's let Congress know. As Michel Moore said on Monday: "don't abandon the best hope we've had in our lifetime for change." Write letters, make phone calls, don't leave it all up to one human being. He needs us. Let's step up to the plate.
Jill Paperno
Glenford, NY

Dear Editor,
Abortion is a central issue in the Health Care Reform debate. Republicans are now trying to prohibit abortion even in health plans that consumers pay for out of their own pockets. Legal abortion is once again at risk.
The idea that a full person exists from the moment of conception is not a scientific fact, but rather a tenet of particular religions. Separation of church and state mandates that religious beliefs not be made into law. Government should not legislate morality.
Abortion has always existed, and will continue to exist no matter what the law says. Keeping abortion legal ensures that it will remain a safe medical procedure.
The ability to choose legal abortion is essential to the health and well-being of women and families. Birth control doesn’t always work, and isn’t always available or affordable. Unless a woman can decide when or whether to become a mother, she cannot decide how to live her life. And women’s self-determination is essential to a just society. Women, as they say, hold up half the sky.
Our political representatives are constantly bombarded with anti-choice messages, even though those opinions are the minority. I urge readers to contact their Congressional representatives and leaders and to tell them that full reproductive services must be kept in health care plans.
Miriam Berg
Bearsville, NY

Dear Editor,
Recently, the Dow closed up over 10,000 for the first time in over a year. Wall Street is recovering quickly, but Main Streets across America continue to struggle with a national average of 9.8%
unemployment.
Americans are fed up with unacceptable treatment from the giant financial institutions. They’ve squeezed every last dime from us with tricky banking and credit card fees. They destroyed our economy with risky investment schemes and scoop up $400 billion in our tax dollars to bail themselves out.
Today, they have deployed an army of high-paid lobbyists and a million dollar ad campaign to convince Congress, that it shouldn’t change the lax regulations and cozy relationships that got our country into this mess.
Earlier this year, our representatives in Congress passed the toughest credit card reform bill in history and our government is in the process of putting those reforms in place. Last month, customers began complaining about the ridiculous checking overdraft fees. Complaints from members of Congress prompted some banks to “voluntarily” cut what they were charging.
A proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency would protect customers from abusive financial schemes, fine print and confusing loan contracts so we know the risk we’re taking on. We’d have a regulator whose only job is to create sensible consumer rules, while making sure lenders and banks follow them, and going after those who don’t. States would share the job with Washington, so we’d have no more extra-risky mortgages, or hidden tricks in credit cards and loans.
The financial industry knows this would end their cozy deal, and they’re fighting it tooth and nail. They’re lobbying against a watchdog that would prevent their risky schemes. Their running TV ads
attacking the concept of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency. We must not let these charlatans to turn the table, because we must change how we do business in this country and return to sensible credit and lending practices.
Jim O'Leary
Delhi, NY

Dear Editor,
I am saddened by the Norwegian Nobel Committee's decision to award Barack Obama the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. As much as I love and respect our President, this was a hasty decision that will not bring good consequences. To me it seems that the requirements to receive the Peace Prize have, in the last decades, become so diluted that only famous and rich politicians are able to be awarded the prize. Here I think of Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and now our current President. These public servants have already received so much recognition and fame that they do not need the prestigious Peace Prize.
What about the thousands of common people who have devoted their entire lives for peace? They should be the ones who are considered. Martin Luther King and Desmond Tutu, for example, received the Peace Prize because they gave their lives to working against violence, especially racially motivated violence, and war.
True, our President has fostered a new climate of diplomacy and openness in Washington and in the world -- a vast improvement over his bomb-first, ask-questions-later predecessor. But campaign promises and political realities aside, he has yet to demonstrate a commitment to a peaceful resolution of the conflict in Afghanistan. And there are many among us, even his supporters, who remain skeptical of his actions in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East.
Jesus says we will know a tree by its fruits. Even the best fruit takes time to ripen. How can our President -- as good-willing as he might be -- bear meaningful fruit after less than a year in office? The Nobel Committee should do better than this. I hope that many other voices will join me in expressing their disappointment in this decision.
Johann Christoph Arnold, Pastor
Woodcrest Bruderhof
Rifton, NY

Dear Editor,
The Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency has had, for months, scheduled a Household Hazardous Waste and Recovery Day for October 10th. Several months ago, I put the date in my calendar and planned for it with all of the excitement of attending a party where the gifts were all environmentally dangerous. (What would a bride call this? Her "mercury anniversary?")
I alerted neighbors. I was gathering up old printers, computer monitors, paint thinners, dead fluorescent bulbs, insecticides, etc. I felt like a witch who was only missing "eye of newt" to make my poisonous brew complete.
And then, the day before the event, I went to the website (http://www.ucrra.org/recycling/hhw.htm) and discovered that you had to have made an appointment and that they were all booked up.
An appointment to recycle? When did landfills get so fancy? The demand, I was told, was overwhelming. Eh, what would this tell us? That the event needs to be extended? Nope.
The next event will not be until next Spring and the operator who answers the "hotline" suggests booking appointments in February!
I had half a mind to set all of my recyclables on an inner tube and send them down the Esopus, but a saner mind prevailed.
If Ulster County government is serious about protecting the environment, they need to figure out how to make this event happen more frequently than the changing of the equinox.
In the meantime, if you need a broken computer, ancient paint thinner, or a couple of half-used cans of bug spray, have your people call my people. No appointment necessary.
Stevan Alburty
Chichester, NY

Dear Editor,
October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month and across the country, battered women’s advocates are joining elected officials & concerned citizens and many others to organize events and activities that raise awareness about domestic violence.
Fifty-five percent of the 157 female homicide victims in New York last year were murdered in domestic violence incidents, according to a state report released Monday.
One in six of the 800 homicide victims known to police in 2007 had a domestic relationship with their assailants -- either as an intimate partner, child or other family member, a State Division of Criminal Justice Services study found. More than half (72) of the 135 domestic homicide victims were currently or had been in an intimate relationship with the offender, and females were the victims in 81 percent (58) of those cases, the study said.
On September 30th, Ulster County Executive Michael P. Hein led the way in bringing business leaders, city officials and concerned citizens together to put domestic violence in the forefront of our community and elevate it as a mainstream social issue.
The program consisted of speeches, group sharing, and lighting the County building purple and a moment of silence to remember and honor those lives touched by domestic violence.
The night would not have been possible without the support of the Ulster County Executive Michael P. Hein . I would like to acknowledge and thank him for his support in shining a light on domestic violence and sending a message that domestic violence has no place in our community!
Thank you Michael P. Hein for caring !
Kathleen Welby-Moretti
Program Director, Family Domestic
Violence Services
Kingston, NY

Dear Editor,
After weeks of frustration with computer problems unsolvable via internet tech support, I dug out last month's Phoenicia Times and called one of your advertiser's, Scott Cameron of Computer Cures. com. I'm so glad I did. What a pleasure. He got back to me right away, came to visit my ailing computer next day and spent quality time focused on all my complaints with my beloved old machine and naturally, fixed them all, finding even more that needed easily remediating. He doesn't know I'm writing this, but I am so grateful to him for his ad in your paper and his evident expertise. Thank you both. I heartily recommend his services.
Babette Kiesel
Chichester, NY

Dear Editor,
Here at the Mystery Spot in Phoenicia we'd like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who's come out and supported our free Music for Front Porches concert series and helped make it possible.
It's been a pleasure and an honor to be able to present our series of free musical performances to the community all season long. Deepest thanks to the incredible musicians - many with local ties to our area - who have given their time and talent to play on our front porch: Laura Cantrell, Life in a Blender, Steve Almaas, Two Dark Birds, Uncle Monk (Tommy Ramone and Claudia Tienan), Gail Ann Dorsey, and Ambrosia Parsley & Chris Maxwell.
A special thanks as well to the Kirks and our wonderful neighboring businesses on Main Street who have allowed us to make a little joyful noise on the weekends, and to anyone and everyone who has helped spread the word. Thanks too to those concert-goers who stuck around to browse our seven rooms packed with vintage clothing, vinyl, and assorted oddities.
See you on Main Street!
Laura Levine, Proprietress
Phoenicia, NY

Dear Editor,
The news that Ulster County has a qualified Doctor, Dr. La Mar Hasbrouck, to head the County health department is truly most gratifying. A good Public Health program insures protection from disease with control of water and sewage, restaurant practices, and other environmental hazards. It helps by maximizing effective usage of personnel within the system. The qualified Public Health Nurses have the potential of providing more services than they are often permitted to give. Coordination of the various health care agencies and individuals in the community could result in better health care. A doctor with the experience that Dr. Hasbrouck has can insure the efficient running of the department. In addition to this, however, he can tackle some health problems of the population by working with the educational system, the medical doctors and health care facilities and the media to combat the obesity epidemic. Public Health resulted in getting tobacco usage under control and it is possible that this obesity epidemic could be stemmed by education within the restaurant industry and in general education, and medical practice guided by the Public Health Officer.
And another challenge is the hazard to health and the atmosphere posed by wood burning stoves and fireplaces. This is hard to tackle as both are used and enjoyed by many.
The tangled mess that Dean Palen left the Health Department in will take a while to fix and we wish Dr. Hasbrouck well in the enterprise and look forward to the day when Ulster County's Health Department is up on top.
I am an old Public Health nurse who feels very deeply about the importance of Public Health and good Public Health practices. I think this County deserves the best, not what we have endured for several years.
Mescal Hornbeck
Woodstock, NY