|
Follow Up on the
News
|
Sewer
Vote Set On May 8
The
vote will represent the next step in a progression toward
the establishment of a wastewater treatment plant in Boiceville.
Or it will represent a step away from that commitment. Prior
stages have included the passage of an 80-plus page “Sewer
Use Law” and the creation of a “sewer district”
in the Boiceville hamlet which identifies each of the land
parcels within the district.
Leifeld said attorney Kevin Young has advised him that there
will be a financial separation, by law, between that district
and the rest of Olive.
On May 8, a special vote will be taken to determine whether
or not the treatment plant will be constructed on the Boiceville
parcel on Route 28 formerly occupied by Trail Nursery and
now belonging to the Town of Olive. The vote will be open
only to residents of the sewer district whose name appears
on the tax assessment roll. If a corporation owns several
properties within the district, it would still be entitled
to only one vote- not one per parcel- unless the properties
are listed under different corporate names. In such cases,
a vote will be allowed for each corporate title on the deeds.
Individual residents will be granted a vote for each name
listed as an owner. If three names appear on the parcel listings,
each would have one vote regardless of how many parcels were
involved.
Corporations will be required to present a board resolution
designating an authorized voter for the organization. As owner
of the proposed plant site parcel, Olive has the option of
casting one referendum vote for or against the project as
per the resolution passed at the town board meeting on March
5th to hold a binding vote on the matter. The school district
also has one vote as do partnerships, not-for-profits and
limited liability companies- which must each designate one
voter.
Funding for the water treatment project has been arranged
to be applied through the Community Wastewater Management
Program which receives its financing from New York City and
the Catskill Watershed Corporation. Once in operation, an
agreement has been reached for continued “primary”
funding from New York City with the remaining funds drawn
from households and businesses within the sewer district.
Cost estimates are set at an annual $100 per household with
inflation adjustments after three years and a minimum $250
plus undefined additional amounts per business based upon
usage flow. A provision adds that the sewer district itself
will own and be responsible for the system.
There are 115 land parcels included in the defined district
and the town clerk’s office is busy tabulating the number
of potential voters involved. Estimates run between 200 and
250 votes to be cast at the Boiceville Firehouse on Route
28 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Paper ballots will be resurrected
for the occasion and one of the wooden ballot boxes from the
old Samsonville Church Hall will be borrowed for the day from
the museum artifacts at the Olive Library. With so few qualified
votes to count, firm results are anticipated before 9 p.m.
The “carrot and the stick” element inherent in
the project, as bemoaned by Supervisor Leifeld, is the implied
threat that should the plant proposal be rejected, New York
State can come in and demand that Boiceville construct a treatment
plant at the town’s own expense rather than through
the monies offered from CWC and NYC in the current referendum.
OCS
Budget Set To Be Cut
Out of the $47,003,340 recommended budget, $35,057,945 or
74.59 percent was singled out as being tied to staff salaries
and benefits, which Ford noted is a cost the district cannot
control. Most school board members requested further reductions
in the budget and said they would look for more cuts in line
items.
Ford and Assistant Superintendent for Business Victoria McLaren
said they are currently seeing staff cuts as necessary.
“As administrators, as musicians, as people who love
children we would never want to support cutting anything anytime,
but as mature administrators we are also bound by the fiscal
realities of our world…” said Ford. “We
have an obligation to the public to look at the budget in
a very responsible way.”
Current cuts totaling to $920,824 include two full time music
teachers, seven full time special education teacher assistants,
elimination of elementary summer school, elimination of the
5:15pm late bus run, one full time behavior intervention specialist
and reductions in general office supplies.
Ford said the music reduction was made because of declining
enrollment in the elementary schools. The seven special education
assistant cuts are based on IEP (individual education plan)
need and could be reinstated if recommendations in special
education are made. Ford said the elimination of the elementary
summer school is temporary and will be restored next year,
but there will be no alternative for students in need of help
this summer.
Elementary enrollment as of February 2007 in grades Kindergarten
through six totaled to 774 students. This does not include
special education students. According to Ford, based on the
district’s elementary population and class size policy
there should be 30.23 full time elementary teachers. Onteora
currently has 42 full time elementary teachers.
Eight staff retirements, with six new hires are expected this
year, which in short term will save the district around $240,000
the first year. But health insurance between the retired and
new employees will rise and over the years the district will
carry a larger burden of costs.
Additions incorporated into the proposed budget include a
technology teaching assistant, a full time speech therapist
and the creation of a capital project line. Ford warned that
if voters rejected the budget, an additional $710,440 would
get eliminated. Programs suggested for elimination would include
the Indie program, field trips, non-athletic stipends including
clubs, and sports.
The March 29 district wide vote is to approve $1,862,711 for
two major repair projects. Although projects that concern
the health and safety of students do not require voter approval,
a promise refund in State aid does. As a one time perk, the
district will be getting $662,711 in EXCEL aid (Expanding
our children’s Education and Learning) and the state
will cover 30 percent of the other $1,200,00. The money is
needed for a new boiler at Woodstock Elementary School and
renovations to the high school auditorium. There are two votes
that need to be approved in order to qualify for the state
aid. One will levy the money and the other will release the
money already available from the capital reserve fund. Polls
are open from 2pm to 9pm at local elementary schools, which
will close early that day..
The two-session forum titled “Discussing Dreams, Options
and Realities,” held at Onteora Middle/High school on
March 3, raised many questions, offered new information and
allowed the public to share ideas on three proposals addressing
the reconfiguration of the evolving (and demographically shrinking)
district. New Superintendent Dr. Leslie Ford was on hand meeting
people and keeping time so everyone could be heard.
Informational booths with representatives from the field were
set up, allowing the public to learn about the different plans,
costs, environmental factors, financing, education and transportation.
The attendant crowd of forty or more people at each session
broke into small groups and were drilled with questions by
school board members who gathered data, searching for common
themes.
Tables were set up representing the five topics of the day:
student needs, instruction, facilities, transportation and
community needs.
At the end of each session Armand Quadrini of KSQ Architects
summed up each topic based on the groups point of view and
concerns.
Discussions throughout the day voiced the need to use more
energy efficient ways of heating, light and fuel alternatives
such as bio-diesel for buses. Investment in energy efficient
technology that would lead to long term cost savings was voiced
as a need throughout the district. As part of curriculum based
initiative, people favored educating students in green technology
and conservation.
Uncertainty about local population growth or loss was a concern
regarding proposals for additional elementary school closings.
Quadrini said, “Right now we are faced with enrollment
decline. What happens if enrollment starts to tip in the other
direction?”
The latest adjusted enrollment projections and actual number
of enrolled students between 2002 and 2007 were available
and will soon be listed on the district website. But it appears,
actual student enrollment is lower than projections that do
not take into account the population of home school and private
school students, which came to 210 last year.
Most agreed that the central campus plan would not allow room
for expansion. Operating costs versus the reduction of schools
and how it impacts future costs to the district was a requested
facility study. In addition, questions were raised on what
to do with additional closed buildings — could be rented?
— and what to do with West Hurley elementary school,
closed in 2004. In the end, demographics and community needs
tended to clash on issues of declining enrollment and the
desire to have community-based elementary schools.
Quadrini said, “The group seemed to gravitate to plan
A in terms of its dialogue -in that it maintains a community
school in each neighborhood.”
Plan A is the only proposal that would not close any additional
elementary schools. Concerns were voiced over loss of community,
lack of flexibility and population shifts.
Quadrini said questions were raised regarding the consolidation
of schools, time spent on the bus and what the pollution impact
would be to transport kids further distances. New data collected
by interim transportation supervisor Peter Montalvo showed
an expansion of costs if elementary schools were to close.
Comments were made that the school board should specify what
additional school would close in Plan C. Many wanted to reopen
the West Hurley school, noting it as superior because of land
size (over 30 acres).
Off campus programs such as Indy and Universal Pre-K were
suggested as a way to save school buildings and overhead costs.
At the end of the sessions, Ford gathered the data and asked
participants as they were leaving to write down which plan
they would prefer. Although she said it would not be the deciding
factor, it will help the district come up with solutions that
would ultimately lead to a plan that the community can agree
on.
A report on their findings will be given at a future school
board meeting.
GOP
Tries Regrouping
Ms. Minew was visibly pleased to have even that many people
appear. “Meetings in the last year have been me and
Chet,” she told the group, which was gathered around
an open rectangle of tables in a large chamber of the Olive
Legionnaire’s hall. “It was getting lonely.”
In an interview a few days before the meeting, Chairman Scofield
had said that the meeting was called with the hope of spurring
Olive Republicans to greater activity, especially in terms
of finding suitable candidates to run for the three official
positions that will be opening in the fall: two seats on the
board, and the office of the supervisor itself.
“I’d like to see things turn around,” he
had said. “There aren’t any watchdogs. We need
a little more say, and they [the Democrats] need more of a
watchful eye [over their actions.]”
Chairman Scofield and Ms. Minew did their utmost to keep the
discussions of those gathered focused on the goal of determining
candidates, and raising public awareness about what many Republicans
are calling a “one-party government” in the Town
of Olive. A few of those in attendance, however, seemed just
as eager to voice their grievances about the perceived abuses
of the Democrats in power – and the ways in which it
was supposed that they were contriving to perpetuate their
dominance over local government.
When harangues began to be aired against the likes of Rep.
Maurice Hinchey and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, however,
Scofield and Minew urged their fellow Republicans to keep
their focus, for the moment, on Olive.
“Olive at this point is in desperate straits,”
Ms. Minew reminded them. She added her view that the Democrats
had been “running ragged” over the Republicans
in the town. “We’ve been too nice.” She
said.
This last statement brought an immediate rumble of agreement
from everyone present. Several held forth the opinion that,
because of the public weariness with the Bush Administration
and the war in Iraq, Republicans had become easy scapegoats
at every level of government, right down to small town governments
like that of Olive. They bitterly averred that, for whatever
reason, Republicans (in Olive at least) had become overly
docile, and effectively allowed their platform to be stolen
out from under them.
For all their zeal and fervor, Chairman Scofield and the other
persons present made certain to emphasize that their hope
was not to reestablish the Republican-dominated Olive that
existed 40 years ago, but merely to bring back what they see
as a lack of balance in town government. This means reminding
the citizens of Olive that there is a Republican party, and
that its views are as worthy of as much consideration as those
of the ruling Democrats.
Looking ahead to when they might find a Republican candidate
to begin campaigning for, Ms. Minew advised her fellows to
speak to their neighbors not of Republicanism per se, but
simply of the need for fairness and equal representation in
government.
“’Our town is being run according to a one-party
political agenda,’” she told them to say. “’Do
you really think that’s the way things ought to be in
America?’”
Still, this appeal will only work if the Republicans can manage
to find a candidate who will run on the Republican ballot
for any of the upcoming posts, much less candidates for all
three of them – one of which being that of the Town
Supervisor.
Burndt (or “Bert”) Leifeld, the Democrat who has
been Olive’s Supervisor for 20 years, and was on the
town board for 11 years before that, does not seem to consider
Republican opposition a serious threat.
“There was always a Republican majority before [I started
serving],” he recalled, citing an influx of Democrats
from New York City as a large factor in changing the town’s
political makeup.
He said that when it comes to the next election, “The
deciding factor is that I’m doing a hell of a job.”
“Thirty-one years [in public office] speaks for itself,”
he said.
Information provided by the Ulster County Board of Elections
indicates that there is, in fact, a higher number of Democrats
registered in Olive than Republicans, with the difference
being about 195 voters, out of a total of 2,045.
Councilwoman Linda Burkhardt, who has served on the Town Board
for seven years, is convinced that the party with which a
candidate is aligned in Olive has little (if any) bearing
upon whether he or she is elected.
“It’s just a matter of the people willing to run,”
the Democrat said with a laugh in her voice. “There’s
no way I would have gotten elected without a lot of Republicans
voting for me.”
At the Republican Party meeting, Paula Minew criticized the
apparent smugness of the Democrats in power. “They’re
so cushy in their jobs, they think they’re unbeatable,”
she said.
This echoed a prior statement by Party Chairman Scofield,
in which he said, “Once you’re in power for long
enough, you feel like you can walk on water.”
It’s this sense of invincibility, and the possible lack
of accountability that some think has formed along with it,
that concerns the members of the Olive GOP. During the meeting,
repeated calls went out from Mr. Scofield and Ms. Minew both
for the people present to be always on the lookout for possible
candidates – or even to consider running themselves.
“We had nobody to put on the ballot during the last
election,” Mr. Scofield said, confirming Ms. Burkhardt’s
statement that there were, in fact, Republicans voting for
Democrats. “We need to be grabbing people off the street.”
He said.
He went on to enumerate the characteristics of the ideal GOP
candidates. “They need to work for the interest of all
citizens – not just Republicans,” he said. “They
need to be really interested – willing to go out and
work – willing to knock on doors.”
“And they need to be fighters,” Ms. Minew added.
“They’re going to need to fight tooth and nail
to get anything done [in the current town government.]”
Numerous means of further publicizing and organizing town
Republicans (and non-Democrats in general) were discussed,
including the possibility of a MySpace page, which was suggested
by one of the youngest people present, who said that “there
are a lot of conservatives on the Internet.”
As for immediate goals, party members were entreated to each
bring one new person to the next meeting with them, and thereby
double their numbers. Many of them gave their solemn word
that they would at least make the effort; but the results
of such efforts won’t be evident, of course, until the
next meeting.
Town of Olive GOP meetings are held on the third Tuesday of
every month, at the American Legion Hall, on Mountain Rd.,
in Shokan. The next meeting will be on April 17th.
A Jar Of Olives
Healing
Haircuts
One wintry afternoon I brought my fifteen-year-old daughter,
Sylvia Mae Gorelick, to Zuccala for a healing haircut.
Beyond the house is a barn that has been renovated and
divided into separate studios for Travaglia and Zuccala.
We entered a light, airy room with colorful carpets and
a massage table. A long-legged chair sits facing a mirror.
Clay busts sculpted by Zuccala populate a row of shelves,
while an antique saw blade adorns a wall. Light comes
through a number of old-fashioned windows of four or six
small panes each.
Zuccala offers us tea made of star anise, cardamom, and
Japanese kukicha twigs, then drapes Sylvia with a thin
maroon robe and seats her in the tall chair. “Tell
me what you love about your hair,” she begins.
“I don’t think about it that much. It just
hangs there,” Sylvia replies. “Lately I’m
feeling weighed down by it.”
“So what wouldn’t you like to have?”
“Not bangs.”
“Do you want it all one length, or do you want movement
in your hair?”
“Movement.”
“You’re an actress, aren’t you ? And
probably you dance? So you need to be able to keep your
hair away from your face. Do you like having long hair?”
“No, I’m not attached to it. I think of my
hair as very boring.”
“So you want hair that can dance a little. Maybe
some layering?”
Zuccala explains that she is going to touch Sylvia’s
head, face, shoulders, back, and hips as she shifts and
releases energy blocks. “Stresses in our lives create
blockages internally, what we call ‘the issues in
your tissues’. In a short session, we might not
be able to release the issues, but we can get things to
flow more freely. This gives you the opportunity to create
a new intention and let go of old things. You might feel
vibrations or sensations of cold or warmth—that’s
just the energy moving.”
Sylvia closes her eyes and takes several deep breaths,
and Zuccala works in silence for ten or fifteen minutes.
At the end, Sylvia says she felt “a lot of clogged-up
things” releasing.
As Zuccala proceeds to the haircut, she explains that
she studied at the Queens Beauty Institute and worked
at a salon on 57th Street in Manhattan, where she met
her husband. “A client there was describing a man
who loved classical music, eating organic food, exercising—I
said he sounded just like me. She said, ‘And he’s
my father.’ I said, ‘He must treat you well,
and if she does, he must treat other women well.’
He’s very loving and caring,” she discovered.
Zuccala studied sculpture with a teacher from Tuscany
at the New School and became so connected to the work
and the class that she became his assistant. “I
was always good at sculpting hair,” she notes.
A certified Reiki master, she bartered with her teacher
for classes, doing hair and makeup for the wedding of
the teacher’s daughter. She studied Integrated Energy
Therapy both in Jersey City and upstate. When she first
moved north, yoga classes in Stone Ridge brought her into
the local community. “I come from a big family,
and that’s what it started to feel like here. People
were connected and caring—such powerful women.”
She gives Sylvia’s hair a few final snips and asks
what she thinks.
“I feel so relieved,” says Sylvia, swinging
her now chin-length hair to watch the top layers slide
across the bottom ones.
Zuccala nods. “I believe hair should have movement
to it, no matter what the length. Just like the energy
work, it should have energy. One of my clients was a painter
who was painting beautiful pieces with a lot of movement,
but her hair was stiff. I worked to release the energy
in it.”
For more information on healing haircuts or Integrated
Energy Therapy, call Sandra Zuccala at 657-8673.
Trouble With DEP Police...
From the perspective of the city DEP’s
administrative levels, the stated dissatisfaction
does not reflect what they characterize as
a tripling of investment in DEP policing activities
and infrastructure, reflective of their concerns
over the reservoir system’s safety.
In between, a number of long-time DEP watchers
— including county Sheriff Paul Van
Blarcum and Bert Leifeld, supervisor of the
town of Olive, where much of the DEP force
is based – have wondered whether all
the noise may simply be the byproduct of ongoing
contract negotiations between the city and
its DEP police force.
It all started, at least in its present public
form, when LEEBA President Kenneth Wynder
Jr. sent out a press release on March 14 in
which he reported that, “Recently New
York City Department of Environmental Protection
(DEP) Police Officers, members of the Law
Enforcement Employees Benevolent Association
(LEEBA), canvassed the membership for a vote
on the performance of Chief Edward Welch and
Assistant Chief Mark Benedetto. 95% of the
officers voted and of 91% voted against Chief
Welch while 85% voted against Asst. Chief
Benedetto. These officers expressed their
opinion that mismanagement within DEP Police
must end.”
Continuing, Wynder’s release complained
about how the DEP “has no apparent definable
future goals or long term plans” for
its Police Division, resulting in low morale.
“The present administration utilizes
intimidation, retaliation, and unauthorized
disciplinary actions instead of leadership
to control the members of the command,”
LEEBA charged. “The turnover rate in
the ranks of DEP Police remains the highest
of any City Department and it directly affects
the safety of New York City’s Water
Supply and the citizens of the surrounding
watershed. Relations with the public and other
neighboring police agencies are strained.”
Wynder noted cases where promotions were refused
longstanding officers, inadequate infrastructure
and equipment, poor personnel policies, and
bad communications of both a literal and metaphorical
basis.
“DEP Police Officers are extremely dissatisfied
with the current management,” Wynder
concluded. “Through retaliation, discrimination
and unauthorized disciplinary actions, the
Chiefs have degraded morale to its lowest
ebb.”
Asked to reply to the union release, New York
City DEP spokesperson Ian Michaels confirmed
that contract negotiations were underway,
then countered a number of the charges made
against the department and its management
without going t=into any personnel details
regarding Welch and Benedetto, or any matters
currently part of the contract talks.
“The security of the water supply is
of the highest priority to the DEP. That is
why we have made a huge investment in the
DEP Police,” Michaels wrote in his own
release of March 20. “In the last five
years, DEP has tripled the size of the force
and added new units such as Emergency Services.
DEP has invested over $120 million in facilities
and equipment to improve the effectiveness
of the DEP Police, including the construction
of five new precincts and two new training
centers. The DEP will continue to work to
make the DEP Police an even more effective
force for the people who rely on and live
near the water system.”
Van Blarcum said that his department has a
good working relationship with the DEP Police.
Leifeld, whose town is host to much of the
Ashokan Reservoir, as well as the DEP Police
headquarters, added that his town’s
police department also works well with DEP
police and that Olive residents have no issues
with the department.
Wynder could not be reached for further comment
beyond his statement despite several calls
to all his listed numbers, as well as e-mails,
in the week since his initial press release.
|
|