(News Briefs MAY
10, 2007)
FAD Battle?
The Coalition of Watershed Towns and a number of state officials
and local governments have decided to try fighting the federal
Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to grant
New York City a 10-year extension of a variance that allows
it to avoid filtering its water supply, even though there
deadline for such complaints is May 31..
Republican representatives from the Catskills watershed area,
including State Senators John Bonacic and James Seward, as
well as Assemblymen Clifford Crouch and Peter Lopez, have
joined the Coalition and the Delaware County Board of Supervisors
to
blast the federal agency’s proposal, which has generally
received support from state, city and other county and towns’
support. The legislators cited, in particular, issues relating
to recreational access to city-owned lands as problematic
as well as the city’s reluctance to create adequate
“voids” in their reservoirs.
A resolution drafted by the four lawmakers is circulating
throughout the vast watershed region and was okayed Monday
in Shandaken. It states that all local governments that pass
the resolution unequivocally oppose the EPA’s proposed
10-year filtration avoidance determination and demands the
agency reduce the term not to exceed five years, even though
not all towns have, or will, vote on the measure. It also
calls for several changes in the avoidance package, including:
the incorporation of late comments made by municipalities
within the watershed, the holding of more hearings on flooding
within the watershed and in adjoining areas, requiring that
New York City open its lands within the watershed for recreational
purposes on par with state-owned lands, except for land that
should be protected due to legitimate security and public
safety concerns. requiring New York City to create voids within
its reservoirs to take into account the effects of rain and
melting snow, and requiring that New York City fund the Coalition
of Watershed Towns in an amount adequate for the coalition
to establish an ombudsman program to advocate for municipal
needs… and avoid going bankrupt.
Last week, the executive board of the Coalition of Watershed
Towns held a closed session to discuss possible legal action
against the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal.
Talk from Coalition attorney Kevin Young and others this past
week has suggested that there is currently a scramble to file
necessary legal paperwork within the coming two weeks.
Planning Board
“There’s a lot of information out there about
what planning boards do but not a lot of information about
how they do it,” reflected Drew Boggus, a member of
the Olive Planning Board since January. “So, we’re
learning. We have a full board of seven members who all seem
interested in being on the board and participating in the
decisions.”
David Jones, who also came “on board” in January
when the entire planning board of that time resigned in protest
to the town board’s failure to reappoint one of their
members, sees his service on the new board as a way to “give
something back to the community” in which he lives.
Jones, an excavator, sees the primary objective of planning
board business as the promotion of “progress in the
community in terms of development.”
“They’ve got a way to go but, so far, they’re
doing fine, participating in their (educational) courses and
really getting into it,” observes Olive Supervisor Brendt
Leifeld, both pleased and relieved that the sudden turnover
hasn’t collided with problems. “They’re
calling the county boys all the time and the chairman is one
who likes to research everything, so that’s good.”
“We’re meshing together well,” said new
board member Helene Grant, an insurance agent with a Master’s
degree in education. “To address things we’ve
never done before is, of course, a challenge but the people
chosen (to be on the board) all have a sincere interest in
what we’re doing. Our first responsibility, I think,
is to measure all potential impacts for the town- environmental,
economic and human.”
No major issues have arisen in the five or six meetings they’ve
had thus far, she noted, and as each situation is confronted,
exposure to different kinds of issues will be gained that
will aid in balancing their collective judgment in the future.
It’s a bit like riding a bike, Grant thought, seemingly
to suggest that the momentum of ‘doing it’will
help provide a certain dynamic stability to the process.
“We’re going cautiously because we’re new,”
she said. “But I have a much greater appreciation of
the necessity for a board of this type.”
Planning board members are required to undergo a minimum of
four state-supervised hours of training a year and most of
the board members attended a State Environmental Quality Review
presentation at the Ulster County Office Building in March.
The training manual they’re using, prepared by Pace
University, is designed to prepare them for their certification
by New York State.
“The training is ongoing,” said Boggus. “As
you get into it, you realize that it goes deeper and deeper
into what our job function is. There’s nothing I see
coming up right now that looks like it’ll be a serious
problem for us although there may be some zoning laws that
may need closer attention. I wouldn’t say there’s
anything big but there are some inconsistencies or things
that aren’t dealt with in the zoning laws and subdivision
laws that, as we get to where we think we know enough, we’ll
probably approach the town board at some point about the possibility
of making an amendment.”
One of the examples offered by Boggus as a possible area of
future interest, given with a caution that he has yet to delve
into the history of how the issue may have been handled in
the past in the course of general operations, is the question
of apartment dwellings.
“When you read the zoning laws, one of the things that
stands out immediately is that there’s no mention of
apartments whatsoever,” Boggus pointed out. “Within
the town, there’s a number of what I’ll call ‘houses
cut up into apartments’ but if somebody comes before
us now with a site plan to take a building and turn it into
apartments, there’s nothing to work with to actually
make that happen.”
Boggus conjectured that when such a situation occurred in
the past, it was up to the Zoning Board of Appeals to get
involved.
“I’m guessing that someone probably went before
the ZBA to get a variance of the zoning laws,” he mulled.
“I believe the underlying guidelines have been ‘one
household per acre’ as an absolute minimum. So, if you
wanted to put four apartments into a house and you had four
or more acres, it’s likely that the ZBA would approve
it. But there’s nothing in the zoning law to describe
what’s acceptable or not in terms of apartments. That
may be intentional, I don’t know. It could be that they
wanted individual considerations for each site instead of
establishing an across-the-board guideline or rule.”
Venturing that the planning board, ZBA and town board should
go over some of the questionable spots together at some future
point to decide whether or not they wanted to address them
as issues, Boggus thinks that a Master Plan is something that
will eventually have to be accomplished. Olive had begun to
make some progress in that direction around the 1988 to 1990
period but firm opposition to some of the provisions being
debated and a changing town board had shifted the enterprise
not only to a back burner but, apparently, to an unlit burner
in another room.
“There is what I would call a ‘poor man’s
comprehensive plan’ at the beginning of the zoning regulations
that kind of gives an overall idea of what the purpose of
the zoning regulation is,” Boggus said. “But there’s
a lot of pressure from other sources for towns to have a comprehensive
plan. The state seriously encourages it and the county. You
see a number of towns working on it. Woodstock is working
on one. I think Gardiner is working on some kind of comprehensive
plan. A number of them are doing it and I’m sure we’re
going to have to do it eventually.”
“I haven’t heard reference to that in years,”
Leifeld said of the Master Plan. “It’s probably
sitting on a shelf here somewhere. A comprehensive plan has
its advantages but it creates a lot of problems. We probably
shouldn’t forget about it, though.”
Tax Shifts…
Ulster County lawmakers are voting this week to impose a county
mortgage tax and to hike the hotel/motel tax from two percent
to four percent. County Legislature Ways and Means Committee
Chairman Alan Lomita said both taxes are seen as viable alternatives
to hiking the property tax.
“The sales and hotel/motel tax should bring in some
$4 million per year” he said. “The biggest issue
on the minds of our residents is the high property tax. The
mortgage tax increase, the hotel/motel tax increase, will
lighten that load on the residents of Ulster County.”
Right now, Ulster County receives nothing from mortgage tax
filings. Towns and the state receive a tax. The new plan would
give the county 25 cents on each $100 of a mortgage.
Meanwhile, County Treasurer Lewis C. Kirschner recently announced
that the 2006 Annual Financial Report for the County of Ulster
has been completed and filed with the State Comptroller on
April 30, 2007. He noted that in 2006, the Unreserved/Unappropriated
General Fund Balance is $17.8 million. In 2005, the Unreserved/Unappropriated
General Fund Balance was $11.9 million. This represents an
increase in the County’s Unreserved/Unappropriated General
Fund Balance of $5.9 million compared with 2005.
“The factors that have influenced this increase are
cost containment initiatives, cost cutting measures and an
increase in tax revenues,” Kirschner said. “As
a result, the County was able to continue to work towards
stabilizing its financial position.”
It is recommended by the State Comptroller’s Office
that municipalities should maintain an unreserved/unappropriated
fund balance of between 5% and 10% of their total general
fund budget. The $17.8 million represents approximately 6.9%
of the County’s general fund budget.
The CWC Board…
At its annual meeting on April 24, the Catskill Watershed
Corporation Board of Directors said farewell to Ward Todd,
a long time colleague, as it welcomed newcomer Michael Shultis,
town supervisor of Hurley, to its ranks. Georgianna Lepke
of Sullivan County and Michael Flaherty of Greene County were
returned to five-year seats without opposition.
Todd, of Shandaken, had been one of two Ulster County representatives
on the 15-member CWC Board since 1997, shortly after the establishment
of the non-profit organization. As a member of the Ulster
County Legislature, he was eligible for service on the CWC
Board, which requires its members to be locally elected officials.
Mr. Todd subsequently relinquished his elected post to become
Executive Director of the Ulster County Chamber of Commerce,
and so stepped down from the CWC Board when his term expired.
Todd, who was first vice-president of the board, chaired the
Education Committee. He also served on the Finance, Septic
and Economic Development Committees, as well as the Temporary
Committee on Tourism and Regional Marketing.
Shultis was elected Hurley’s Supervisor in 2005. He
serves full-time in that capacity. Born in Kingston, he has
lived most of his life in Hurley, where he served for 15 years
on the town’s Zoning Board of Appeals. The owner of
Shultis Forest Products, he has been a timber harvester since
1976. He and his wife Marie, our advertising director, have
five children ranging in age from 11 to 26 and one grandchild.
Officers of the CWC Board who were named at the Annual Meeting
April 24 include President Perry Shelton, First Vice President
Michael Flaherty, Second Vice President Berndt Leifeld, Secretary
Charles Buck, and Treasurer Georgianna Lepke.
The CWC’s Tenth Annual Report was also issued at the
CWC’s Annual Meeting of Member Towns, touting the organization’s
history and accomplishments, including the replacement of
2,380 failed residential septic systems in the region, the
building of 39 sand and salt storage sheds, reimbural of $2.3
million for 41 stormwater control projects associated with
new construction, the awarding of nearly $10 million in grants
for some 70 municipal projects to correct or improve existing
stormwater controls, assess infrastructure networks and plan
repairs and upgrades, the completion of Community Septic Systems
and Community Wastewater Management Projects in five more
hamlets, for a total capital commitment of approximately $26
million, the awarding of grants totaling $392,000 to ten municipalities
for community planning initiatives under the Local Technical
Assistance Program, the distribution of 132 low-interest loans
valued at more than $27 million to start-up businesses and
to firms planning building or inventory expansions, facility
improvements or other projects resulting in the creation or
retention of more than 1,000 jobs, the provision of 122 grants
to non-profit organizations and others planning community
improvement, cultural enhancement and business development
projects, support for a number of tourism promotion efforts,
and the current development of a regional tourism and marketing
web site with mapping capabilities, the awarding of more than
$1.2 million in Watershed Education grants to schools and
non-profit organizations serving thousands of students in
New York City and in the Catskill-Delaware Watershed, the
coordination of five Watershed Stream Clean-ups involving
hundreds of volunteers, sponsorship of Catskills Local Government
Days, and more.
For more information on CWC programs and activities, and to
read the 2006 Annual Report, go to www.cwconline.org. Hard
copies of the report can be obtained by calling Diane Galusha
at 845-586-1400, ext. 29; galusha@cwconline.org.
Dam Safety
US Senator Charles Schumer and Congressman John Hall have
announced their support for legislation that would seek to
protect old dams by requiring the FEMA director to establish
a program to provide grants to states to rehabilitate publicly-owned
dams that fail to meet minimum safety standards and pose an
unacceptable risk to the public. The other measure would require
the Secretary of the Army to maintain and update information
on a dam inventory.
“In many cases, these dams are literally falling apart.
If we don’t act fast we could have a real mess on our
hands that could involve a loss of live or a loss of property,”
Schumer said. Hall, who is a major supporter of renewable
energy, added that the government should look into the possibility
of establishing low-head hydro-electric plants on dams as
well.
“You can harvest greater than 1,200 megawatts of power
just by putting turbine generators where the water is already
falling,” he said. “You are not importing anything,
you are not paying for the fuel and there’s no pollution
caused by it.”
Schumer said there are 384 dams in the state classified as
“high hazard” and there are over 5,000 in New
York with only eight full-time employees assigned to the dam
safety program as of 2005.
The state DEC said the “high hazard” classification
does not mean they are unsafe.
Uninsured?
U.S. hospitals are charging uninsured patients about two-and-a-half
times more than those with health insurance, a mark-up that
has been steadily rising despite pressure to level prices,
a new study has found. In 2004, the most recent year for which
data was available, hospital patients without health insurance
and others who pay for medical care out of their own pockets
were charged an average 2.57 times more than those with health
insurance, according to the study published in the May-June
issue of the journal Health Affairs. That number has been
rising steadily since 1984, but has jumped more quickly since
2000, the analysis of government data said.
The American Hospital Association (AHA), which represents
most of the nation’s 5,000 or so hospitals, said the
report was out-of-date and methodologically flawed. The group
said it is misleading because the study predates U.S. Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid guidance, which hospitals say they
needed before they could give discounts to uninsured patients.
Hospitals set rates based on a list called the chargemaster,
which is generally believed to inflate prices substantially,
in the belief that prices will come down during a negotiation
process. For-profit hospitals had the highest discrepancy
between costs estimated by Medicare and prices charged, the
study found.
But patients without health insurance, about 45 million people
in the U.S., lack the ability to negotiate. As it stands,
hospitals only collect about 10 cents on the dollar charged
to uninsured patients.
More than 60 class-action lawsuits have been filed against
U.S. hospitals over the issue.
Locally, the American Cancer Society has issued a release
stating that too many of the uninsured and underinsured are
unable to access services vital to surviving cancer, and urged
that health services be made available to all.
Cancer Society officials met in Kingston with representatives
of state lawmakers as well as Ulster County and City of Kingston
officials to probe the topic of the future of healthcare.
County Changes
Ulster County lawmakers were set to decide the day we were
going to press, May 9,. whether to endorse an agreement with
the county’s top level managers that will hike their
pay but eliminate a special benefit package. Legislator Donald
Gregorius, chairman of the county’s Labor Relations
and Negotiation Committee, said the agreement represents a
completely new look at resolving old issues, particularly
the issue of “salary compression,” where growth
in managers’ salaries was being outpaced by that of
rank-and-file union employees.
“We balanced it out to give new managers something and
help in the middle range, so we can retain people,”
Gregorius said. “It was an attempt to stop the compression
issue. There were longtime CSEA and other union people making
as much or more than managers because of the high pay in different
steps.”
Highlights of the agreement include a 3.25 percent salary
increase for 2006 and 2007, complete elimination of the flexible
spending plan by 2008 and a 10 percent contribution to health
insurance instead of the flat amount (roughly $28) that had
been paid by managers in the past. The agreement also caps
the number of vacation days that managers can accumulate at
30 (managers who currently receive more than 30 days will
be held harmless); reduces sick and vacation time buybacks
from 30 to 15 days as of 2008; and alters the contribution
scale for retiree health insurance.
The agreement, which covers the years 2006 and 2007, will
cost the county $593,664. It covers county department heads,
non-union managers, legislative employees and the Board of
Elections.
Trash Talk?
A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, it seems, may put control
of trash flow back into local hands… if anyone wants
it. The Supreme Court ruled this month that local governments
can compel private trash haulers to use municipal facilities,
even if it would cost more to keep garbage at home than to
dispose of it elsewhere. The ruling upholding local ordinances
in upstate New York protects a stream of money that allows
counties, like other governments that have built recycling
centers and landfills, to help pay off millions of dollars
in debt they incurred to establish such facilities. County
leaders say this can lead to new laws for flow control, which
would be used to direct waste generated in a specific geographic
area to a designated landfill or recycling facility through
laws, regulations or economic incentives.
Stephen J. Wing, counsel to the Ulster County Resource Recovery
Agency, said the ruling may provide the means for the county
to establish a recycling program. In the past, he said, it
was not economically feasible because the program had to compete
with private operations. Now, with the county’s ability
to direct waste to the program, it might be plausible, he
said.
The trash hauling companies had argued that the counties violated
constitutional protections for interstate commerce. The companies
argued that they would pay much less to send the garbage to
out-of-state transfer stations where it is sorted and baled
before being shipped off for permanent disposal. But the court,
in a 6-3 decision, said the Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management
Authority treats “in-state private business interests
exactly the same as out-of-state ones,” avoiding any
constitutional problems.
“It bears mentioning that the most palpable harm imposed
by the ordinances - more expensive trash removal - is likely
to fall upon the very people who voted for the law,”
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court.
Polluted Buses?
Day in and day out, children across the U.S. are riding to
school on aging buses, breathing what some activists say is
a dangerous brew of pollutants up to five times dirtier than
the air outside. It is a situation that Congress and many
states have sought to fix in recent years. In fact, in 2005
federal lawmakers passed a measure to replace or retrofit
the dirtiest diesel engines across the nation… But little
has been done.
Around the country, state officials are struggling to find
the money to carry out clean school bus initiatives. And Congress
has yet to deliver on the $1 billion it promised over five
years to help states clean up diesel fleets, including school
buses.
Breathing high concentrations of diesel emissions - known
as particulates - can cause minor ailments such as headaches,
wheezing and dizziness. But studies have also found the contaminants
can do more serious damage. Recent studies by the Environmental
Protection Agency and other groups link the emissions to asthma
and lung cancer.
Two types of filters are available to reduce the most dangerous
emissions on older buses. Diesel particulate filters - which
are installed in place of mufflers at an estimated cost of
$700 each - can reduce tailpipe emissions by at least 85 percent.
Closed crankcase filtration systems, which go under the hood
and cost $7,500, can reduce engine soot by about 90 percent.
A bus can be fitted with one or both filters.
An estimated 390,000 diesel school buses are on the road in
the U.S., according to the EPA. Most newer buses were manufactured
to meet stricter emissions guidelines and do not need filters.
But about one-third of the nation’s diesel school-bus
fleet, or more than 100,000 buses, were manufactured before
1990 and are big polluters, according to EPA.
Researchers say older buses also let lots of emissions enter
through doors and windows. The longer the ride, the more harmful
to children, they say, putting students in rural areas in
particularly unhealthy circumstances.
Experts say children are particularly vulnerable because soot
particles can disrupt development of their respiratory systems.
Also, children breathe more quickly than adults and take in
more air per pound.
Pet Food…
On the tail of the recent pet food debacle, federal officials
have placed a hold on 20 million chickens raised for market
in several states because their feed was mixed with pet food
they are saying contained an “industrial chemical.”
Three government agencies - the Agriculture Department, the
Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection
Agency - are overseeing a risk assessment to determine whether
the chickens would pose a threat to human health if eaten.
They add that the 20 million chickens represent a tiny fraction
of the 9 billion chickens raised each year in the United States.
Which states have chicken producers affected by the hold will
be announced later, the government said. State agriculture
officials as well as chicken manufacturers were being contacted
as the agencies determine the extent of the problem, adding
that many farms in several states probably were involved.
Investigators found last week that about 5 percent of feed
used at some smaller chicken production operations came from
pet food tainted with the chemical melamine. Larger manufacturers,
because they usually use special feed for the chickens they
raise or contract for raising, are unlikely to have exposed
their animals to large amounts of the tainted pet products.
Since March 16, more than 100 brands of pet food have been
recalled because they were “contaminated with melamine.”
An unknown number of dogs and cats have been sickened or died
after eating pet food tainted with the chemical.
Federal investigators have been trying to determine how much
of the tainted pet food had been used in feed for hogs and
chickens. Hog farms in at least six states may have received
tainted pet food for use in feed. Those animals also have
been barred from market.
Water Buyouts!
The Bush administration is helping multinationals buy US municipal
water systems, according to new reports, “putting our
most important resource in the hands of corporations with
no public accountability.”
Documentary filmmakers Alan Snitow and Deborah Kaufman recently
teamed up with author Michael Fox to write “Thirst:
Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water” (Wiley, 2007).
The three followed water privatization battles across the
United States - from California to Massachusetts and from
Georgia to Wisconsin, documenting the rise of public opposition
to corporate control of water resources. They found that the
issue of privatization ran deep.
“We came to see that the conflicts over water are really
about fundamental questions of democracy itself: Who will
make the decisions that affect our future, and who will be
excluded?” they wrote in the book’s preface. “And
if citizens no longer control their most basic resource, their
water, do they really control anything at all?”
Currently, water systems are controlled publicly in 90 percent
of communities across the world and 85 percent in the United
States, but that number is changing rapidly. In 1990, 50 million
people worldwide got their water services from private companies,
but by 2002 it was 300 million and growing.
“Globally, corporations are promoting water privatization
under the guise of efficiency, but the fact is that they are
not paying the full cost of public infrastructure, environmental
damage, or healthcare for those they hurt,” said Ashley
Schaeffer of Corporate Accountability International. “Water
is a human right and not a privilege.”
It turns out the United States is an attractive place for
multinationals looking to make inroads in the water business.
The three main players are the French companies Suez and Veolia
(formerly Vivendi), and the German group RWE. The companies
first pushed water privatization in developing nations. The
companies that already controlled the small percentage of
U.S. water held privately were bought by the big three: Veolia
picked up U.S Filter, Suez got United Water and RWE took over
American Water Works.
In Felton, CA, for instance, a small regional utility ran
the water system until it was purchased in 2001 by California
American Water, a subsidiary of American Water, which is a
subsidiary of Thames Water in London, which has also become
a subsidiary of German giant RWE. Residents have since seen
their rates skyrocket.
Stay tuned…
Death To All?
The bulk of Americans and a slim majority in Mexico want Osama
bin Laden executed if caught, but most people in seven other
countries would rather he spend life or many years in prison,
a recent AP-Ipsos poll has found. In all nine nations surveyed,
markedly more people would choose the death penalty for the
al-Qaida leader than for run-of-the-mill murderers, even in
nations with little taste for capital punishment. But Americans
also still prefer execution over prison for murderers by greater
margins than people in the other countries. Of the nine countries
polled, only the U.S. and South Korea have the death penalty.
The poll underscores stark differences between the U.S. and
many of its allies over the death penalty at a time when U.S.
treatment of terror-war detainees - some of whom may face
execution - has been a major irritant in their relations.
Given a choice of capital punishment for bin Laden or imprisonment,
62 percent in the U.S. supported executing him, while 36 percent
chose prison. More than one-third of those preferring life
imprisonment for convicted murderers said they would support
bin Laden’s execution. Only in Mexico, where people
chose the death penalty over prison for bin Laden by 54 percent
to 35 percent, did sentiment run close to that in the United
States. Opinion ran strongly toward prison in Britain, Canada,
France, Germany, Italy, South Korea and Spain - in some cases
by more than two-to-one margins.
Women were likelier than men to favor life imprisonment over
the death penalty for murderers in all countries surveyed
except Canada, Mexico and Germany, where the genders were
about even. Support for capital punishment also ran lower
for people who are better educated, have higher incomes, are
young or - in the U.S. - are Democrats.
Despite broad support for executions, nearly six in 10 in
the U.S. said abolishing the death penalty would probably
not change the number of murders. Analysts say support for
execution goes beyond a belief in deterrence to peoples’
feelings about justice, revenge and keeping criminals off
the streets.
Stronger Pot
The marijuana being sold across the United States is stronger
than ever, which could explain a growing number of medical
emergencies that involve the drug, government drug experts
are saying. Analysis of seized samples of marijuana and hashish
showed that more of the cannabis on the market is of the strongest
grade, the White House and National Institute for Drug Abuse
said. They cited data from the University of Mississippi’s
Marijuana Potency Project showing the average levels of THC,
the active ingredient in marijuana , in the products rose
from 7 percent in 2003 to 8.5 percent in 2006. The level had
risen steadily from 3.5 percent in 1988.
National Institute on Drug Abuse Director Dr. Nora Volkow
fears the problem is not being taken seriously because many
adults remember the marijuana of their youth as harmless.
According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health 4.1
million Americans, or 1.7 percent of the population, report
they use marijuana .