|
Dear Editor,
This communique is in response to the Resolution adopted by the
Executive Committee of the Coalition of Watershed Towns at their
May 17 meeting which, in part, supports the Belleayre Resort.
It is our understanding that this Resolution was formulated and
adopted just a few days after a meeting with representatives from
the resort. We find it ludicrous that the committee would consider
this resolution without majority support from its membership.
As Supervisor Bert Liefeld was quoted, "What happens if only
40 percent of the towns agree with this?" At this juncture
it seems to us that the CWT Executive Committee should have conferred
with and polled its membership.
Our town received, after the fact, your request for membership
Towns to pass or formally endorse the Executive Committee's Resolution
titled "Opposition to NYC DEP interference with home rule
and pattern of restricting economic development in watershed communities."
We are enclosing an excerpt from our June 10 regular Monthly meeting
minutes which clearly states: "Supervisor Fairbairn asked
the town board if any members were prepared to offer a resolution
of support for the resolution adopted by the CWT Executive Committee
on May 17, 2004. After sufficient time no resolution was offered."
We strongly oppose any CWT resolution that specifically supports
any individual economic entity whatsoever, i.e. paragraph #9.
We strongly feel that this resolution supporting Crossroads Ventures
individually exceeds the parameters of the CWT's mission and long-term
goals.
We are also enclosing an excerpt from the Daily Star dated May
21,2004. Paragraph l and 2 clearly lead the reader to believe
that the entire membership of CWT is in support of the above referenced
Resolution. We believe that such blatant misrepresentation of
the CWT's membership can only defile the organization's credibility.
Jerry A. Fairbairn, Supervisor
Town of Hardenburgh
Dear Editor,
As the Belleayre Resort saga continues to occupy
entrenched rivals at the Issues Conference, I was pleased to learn
of the opinion put forward by John Alschuler concerning the project's
insufficient economic viability. I agree with Dr. Alschuler, whose
consulting firm HR&A had been previously commissioned by the
Catskill Watershed Corporation for advise on the administration
of the Catskill Fund for the Future.
Accounting for the projected revenues, expenses
and taxes itemized by Crossroads in their Draft Environmental
Impact Statement, the resort as proposed appears to have an extremely
high investment risk. By applying basic assumptions concerning
the local real estate market capitalization rate and the most
likely time horizon for project reversion, a correctly developed
financial model would reveal that there is an extremely narrow
relevant range for successful attainment of satisfactory investor
returns.
If any single factor fails to perform as projected,
there is a strong possibility of inadequate return on equity.
This holds true for most any combination of debt and equity mix,
if indeed Crossroads has sufficient access to capital markets
for the project debt component to be stripped into subordinate
tranches. Even more discouraging is that if variances occur in
multiple factors, such as revenues falling short of projections
combined with expense overruns during development, then there
is a strong possibility of exposure to negative equity. And all
of this is before considering any potential obstruction to development.
Because the Environmental Protection Agency has
recommended that NYC have sub-phase evaluation capabilities, it
is almost certain that the Department of Environmental Protection
will be constantly on the project site creating substantial construction
delays. The cost associated with these delays should be enough
to incur significant variances in any financial model. All of
this should raise serious concern for any rational investor.
Although Dean Gitter may have an exceptional
education pedigree, let's not forget that Jeff Skilling, former
CEO of Enron, also has a Harvard MBA. Promises of regional economic
improvement not withstanding, the question remains: Has the investment
risk been truly analyzed, or are the project's financial backers
being sold a turkey?
Clifford Faintych, MBA
Denning, NY
Dear Editor,
Good for you Mescal Hornbeck for remembering
and writing about some of the damage Reagan perpetrated on this
nation in his eight years. Some one wrote, it's as if Gore Vidal
coined the phrase "United States of Amnesia" for the
moment of Reagan's death. It is hoped the facts will survive the
hagiography we are now being inundated with. Reagan installed
a revolving door which key advisors went through to lucrative
jobs as lobbyists - and subsequent indictments for influence-peddling.
Despite his Admin-istration's "law and order" language,
by the 1990's nearly 200 Reagan-era officials had faced investigation
and prosecution. Special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh's conclusion
that Reagan had "created the conditions which made possible
the crimes committed by others" in the Iran/contra scandal
holds true for the more widespread lack of ethical standards.
He presided over a Savings and Loan scandal that cost taxpayers
a bill approaching a trillion dollars. No one in the Reagan White
House appeared to care about a new pandemic that mainly killed
homosexuals. Reagan's inaction and bigotry against gays and drug-users
led to the deaths of tens of thousands that might have been avoided.
A chilling meanness was at the core of Reagan's political agenda
(always effectively concealed by his affability). His main purpose
was to de-legitimize the federal government. RACE WAS ONE CUTTING
EDGE, POVERTY WAS ANOTHER. Remember the "welfare queen"
who rode around in her Cadillac collecting food stamps? She was
never found. Remember ketchup as a vegetable? He tried to gut
the Civil Rights Commission and his Administration waged a series
of attacks on affirmative action while trying to grant tax-exempt
status to private schools that engaged in racial discrimination.
After Democrats and Republicans passed sanctions against the apartheid
government of South Africa, Reagan vetoed the measure. Reagan
tried to normalize relations with Agusto Pinochet, the brutal
dictator of Chile. Pursuing a secret war against the Sandinista
government in Nica- ragua, the Reagan Administration violated
international law and circumvented Congress to support contra
rebels engaged in human rights abuses and, according to the CIA's
own Inspector General, worked with suspected drug traffickers.
Reagan covertly sent arms to the mullahs of Iran and courted Saddam
Hussein even after his use of chemical weapons.
Perhaps many of the people who voted for the second Bush and are
realizing what a disaster his presidency is need to elevate Reagan
to sainthood to make themselves feel alright. And they are going
to fly the flag at half-mast for 30 days? No, it is really for
Ray Charles!
Robert Jacobson
Mount Tremper, NY
Dear Editor,
It's About Time that the Onteora tax payers sent
a message to the School Board. The second vote on the budget was
rejected by a vote of 1,529 against, 1,072 for the budget. That
forced the school to go on an austerity budget. It also sent an
undeniable message to the school board that they start taking
a look at the way the administration runs the school and that
they play a more active part at the beginning of the budget process.
Chairman of the Board, Marino D'Orazio attributed the defeat to
the voter backlash from the town of Olive over the so-called "large
parcel" legislation and the closing of the West Hurley School,
but it also sent the message that the cost per student is way
out of line with other Ulster County schools and the tax payers
want something done about that.
Although the school is now on an austerity budget
don't be surprised if many items that the school threatened to
do away with get restored. When the school was forced to go on
an austerity budget back in the 2001/2002 school year the administration
found $200,000.00 and many items were restored.
William Warnecke
Glenford, NY
Dear Editor,
It's the forest tent caterpillar (not eastern
tent) that's making amess of the woods. Conditions were just right
for a large outbreak this year. CFA will be putting an article
in its news letter later this month. The trees will be defoliated
quickly, then may sprout out again. Only repeated defoliation
for at least 3 years would kill the trees, but this year's growth
will be effected. It is particularly bad between Big Indian
& Catskill Corners.
Eastern Tent likes the hawthorn, cherry &
other fruit trees along the edges of forests & roads. That's
the one with the large white tents. It is striped down its
back and later enstars have two rows of all blue dots. (Gypsy
moth caterpillars have 6 red dots at the head of the two rows
& blue dots along the rest.) The forest tent caterpillar
has smaller, darker tents close on the branches and has a yellow
to white key shaped, single row of dots down its back. It prefers
oak, birch, ash & sugar maple, but does not like red maple.
Jim Waters Catskill Forest Association
Arkville, NY
Dear Editor,
It looks like Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Joseph Lieberman
(D-CT) have been staying cool this summer at the movies. Sure
the summer's first blockbuster, The Day After Tomorrow, amazed
and astounded moviegoers with its stupendously implausible premise
that escalating greenhouse gas emissions would result in the snow-burial
of the Statue of Liberty, but let's hope that is not what has
reinvigorated the lawmakers' quest to pass their Climate Stewardship
Act that failed last year by a vote of 43-55.
The McCain-Lieberman bill, which is expected to be voted on later
this month, requires a draconian cut in the amount of energy we
use. Specifically, the bill calls for energy-intensive operations
(think companies and people that make things) to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions to 2000 levels beginning in 2010.
Regulating energy use in this way, according to a new economic
analysis sponsored by the American Council for Capital Formation
and conducted by Charles River Associates*, would result in job
losses-more than 600,000 jobs would be lost, lower GDP, reduced
tax revenues, higher production costs, and lower household purchasing
power while doing nothing to protect Lady Liberty from climate
change.
Yet, Senators McCain and Lieberman continue to hold to the belief
that these bitter economic costs are to be borne in good spirits
because of the positive environmental benefits that will result.
Let's be clear, the Climate Stewardship Act will do nothing to
prevent or lessen the doomsday scenarios environmentalists have
been trumpeting for years, and which movie producers have come
to of late.
Any threat of climate change associated with greenhouse gas emissions
is linked to global emissions, not emissions in any one country
or one industry. And given that economic and emissions growth
in developing countries like China and India are projected to
account for 84 percent of the increase in global emissions between
1990 and 2010, any climate policy that does not address developing
country emissions is doomed to failure.
Not only do supporters of the McCain-Lieberman bill fail to grasp
the global nature of this issue, they compound their ignorance
by trumpeting the so-called success of the European Union's climate
change efforts.
Europe really isn't doing that well in meeting its emission reduction
goals that it agreed to under the Kyoto Protocol, a 1997 treaty
that calls for countries to make dramatic cuts in energy use in
order to combat climate change, despite the fact that they have
publicly promised that they would. Judging by the experience of
Europe thus far, it seems highly unlikely that mandatory targets
and timetables for greenhouse gas emission reductions for developed
countries are economically achievable: 13 of the 15 original EU
member states are not on target to achieve their Kyoto Protocol
targets. Further, they have little hope of achieving the additional
cuts (50 to 70% below 1990 levels by 2050) being proposed for
the post-2012 period. In fact, the Bush Administration's voluntary
approach to addressing climate change shows more promise than
the mandatory targets and timetables approach called for in the
Kyoto Protocol. Despite this, McCain and Lieberman are determined
for the United States to adopt legislation that would amount to
nothing more than a domestic version of this failed international
treaty.
According to data from the US Department of Energy's Energy Information
Administration, the US, using a voluntary approach, has cut its
energy intensity (or the amount of energy required to produce
a dollar of GDP) by a significantly larger percentage than has
the EU. The EU, which ratified the Kyoto Protocol and thus faces
mandatory emission reductions, has reduced energy intensity by
only 7.5% compared to the 15.8% percent reduction achieved by
the US over the 1992-2001 period. Similarly, the ratio of
CO2 emissions per dollar of output has decreased faster in the
US than in the EU over the past decade, 15.3% for the US compared
to 13.8% in Europe.
Films like the The Day After Tomorrow require viewers to suspend
reality, but service in the United States Congress requires rational
skepticism. Hopefully members of congress will exercise some when
the lights come up and they realize real life isn't much like
the movies.
Dr.
Margo Thorning American Council for Capital
Formation
Dear Editor,
Bravo, Wendy Wolfenson! You are blessed with perspective and insight
as witnessed by your splendid letter (Olive Press, June 17) pointing
out that which we already know regarding the behavior of the Onteora
School Board but would be hard put to express it all so simply
and comprehensively.
You are so "right on" in your assesment of the budget
failure and the board. Your observations add up to arrogance and
a "to Hell with all of you", attitude. From the top
(Board President) cometh the characteristics above listed for
the members to impliment. And indeed they have [for quite some
years]. Might we entertain the notion that as each election for
board members occur we play the "replacement" game if
for no other reason than to reverse the "tail wagging the
dog" syndrome. We have begun the process with David Patterson
but it sounds as if he might be a bit too pliable in the hands
of the current members. Better add a few Mb's to your memory bank,
Dave and do what you said you would do, "not be a 'yes' man".
I must research "recall" for school boards.
Yup! We don't feel like enduring the cancer of the "ORPS",
an illegal entity which like MTA, PANY/NJ, HHC, PSC, LIPA and
other Commissions and Authorities answer to no one. The politicians
who invent these "phantom" agencies are insulated from
complaints and criticism by their constituants and eventually
have no responsibility what-so-ever. And of course the two "cry
babies" from Shandaken and Woodstock are enjoying the spectacle
of a one hundred year agreement [with NYC] being dismantled in
the hopes that their constituants will save a few shekels of silver
and thus resurrect their political fortunes.
I am in total agreement, Ms. Wolfenson with your thesis that the
board with their twist minds see "No" to a budget as
punishing the children and that voting "No" to a budget
that targets our town unfairly is a "thoughtful and caring
alternantive". What part of "No" do they not understand?
And this board is reckless enough to suggest that we, the voters
are the devils who would deprive our children. How dare they?
The board needs to impliment innovation, originality and integrity.
It's not unlike obtaining courage, a heart and a brain. Isn't
that a wonderful analogy? Now, who is the "Wizard" in
the background cranking out the illusionary and deceptive misinformation?
Hm-m-m?
I would remind all that our Town Supervisor who does twenty-five
hour days along with his political brethren, assistants and supporters
has been on top of the ORPS charade from the "git go".
No wonder he has been at the helm for some 22 plus years.
And I hereby nominate Wendy Wolfenson for the position of member
of the Onteora School Board next time around. Go into the booth
with the idea that you are going to "can" some old "hanger
on" and relegate him/her to the "ash heap of mismanaged,
special interest, good old boy education". We will eventually
get it right.
President D'Orazio; I say, "tear down this wall"!
Glenn T. Anderson
Olivebridge, NY
Dear Editor,
While the Woodstock Town Board uncharacteristically attempts a
balanced, well governed plan for the development of cell towers
in Woodstock, Olive officials fight all development. With
old world science and large sums of money our town officials have
fought all cell tower development in this town. Four years ago
Masterpage, a locally owned company, tried to submit a plan to
build a cell tower on South Mountain. Our Olive Town Board
responded with a 32 page Cell Tower Law. Over the last 4
years town Supervisor Berndt Liefield with board members Bruce
LaMonda and Helen Chase have resorted to half truths and voodoo
science to stop cell tower development. Confronted and exhausted
by these tactics, Masterpage has taken this case out of the towns'
hands and asked for a Federal Judges' opinion. This case
now sits on some judges desk, where it has been for about
1 year. If these same officials had been asked to lead us
into the 20th Century we would be walking to our town meeting
which would be lit with candles or lanterns.
Cyrus
McCormack
Moon Haw, NY
Dear Editor,
Congratulations and thanks to Sharon Stonekey and the few others
who have dared to sound a note of realism amidst America's hymn
of adulation to the memory of Ronald Reagan. While Nancy Reagan
deserves the nation's sympathy for the loss of her beloved husband,
Ronald Reagan was neither a great president nor a good one; he
was an actor who won political power by projecting a likable personality.
Moreover, we should remember that Reagan lived well into old age,
with his body dying at age 93 after his brain had been dead for
several years already.
R.B. Wilk
Woodstock, NY
Dear Editor,
Hooray for Westchester !!! The dam be damned ! They had the guts
to stand up to NYCity and opened a road their citizens needed
for their safety and welfare. Why don't our representatives do
the same ? Mr. Parete, Mr. Leifeldt, TEAR DOWN THESE BARRICADES!
Michael Thompson
West Shokan, NY
Dear Editor,
I don't understand why the Onteora School Board is even considering
the Large Parcel Bill. Could you please print the questions I
have asked and the answers I have been given.
Question: Has any other school district considered The Large
Parcel Bill as an option to tax levy?
Answer: One other one in New York State, to my knowledge. There
are thirty-some districts, but most school boards have avoided
this option.
Question: So where is this Ashokan Reservoir I keep hearing about?
Answer: Why, it's in Ashokan. Actually, there is no more
Ashokan. There's only Shokan. Ashokan disappeared in Olive's
history. Perhaps it's under the water as part of Olive City and
Brown's Station.
Question: So the Ashokan Reservoir isn't even in Woodstock or
Shandaken?
Answer: No, it's at least ten miles away from either town.
Question: Where is this large parcel that this infamous Large
Parcel Bill refers to?
Answer: It is in Olive and Hurley. The Ashokan Reservoir
and its watershed lay in some of the towns of the Onteora School
District.
Question: So what's the big deal about the Large Parcel
Bill?
Answer: The "big deal" is that Olive's taxes will go
up 51% without the raise in school taxes and before the reval.
In actuality, a homeowner could take a hit in excess of 60%.
Question: I don't get percentages. Can you give me
an example.
Answer: Sure, In 2001, a modular home costing $138.00 for house
and land went up in Shokan. It now has school taxes of $1700.
Fifty-one percent plus a raise in the tax levy would equate to
$1, 003.00 rise in this year's taxes. This person would
pay $2,703.
Question: Whoa! That's a big jump in one year. I know taxes
go up each year, but I thought a school budget just raised taxes
a reasonable amount each year.
Answer: It is a monumental jump. The raise in taxes
would be an entire winter season's heating bill.
Question: Wouldn't a re-evaluation be a better "leveler"
or "equalizer " of taxes.
Answer:Yes! IIf Olive and Shandaken underwent a total re-val,
taxes in both towns would be leveled. In other words, older
properties that are under-assessed would be raised and newer property
owners would reap a decrease in taxes. The towns would increase
in value lowering high taxed towns, Woodstock for example, would
benefit from the rise in total evaluation of Olive.
Question: Why would the Onteora School District even entertain
the adoption of the Large Parcel Bill?
Answer: They are trying to equalize taxes, but even the Onteora
School Board sees the divisive, political ramifications in passing
a budget that hurts one town and benefits another. People
vote on budgets out of their pockets. Unfortunately, the
school budget rests on property taxes until the State Legislature
deals with this problem.
Question: If the Onteora School Board passes the Large Parcel
Bill, what would be the legal responsibilities of the other towns
that would benefit from the tax distribution?
Answer: A court of law would have to determine that. However,
it does through, the entire school district could be thrown into
the arena of litigation.
Question: Should the Onteora School Board be meddling in
town politics and tax assessments!
Answer: I think not!!!!
Thank you,
Karen Olsen
Olive,
NY
|