Home - Editorial - POV - Masthead - Contact The Olive Press

phoeniciatimes.com designed and hosted by esopuscreek.com Contact the webmaster

Letters to the Editor


Dear Editor,
            On Thursday, October 14, 2004 ˆ the Ulster County Legislature ill-fatedly decided to adopt the Large Parcel Law by a 19-13 vote.  Unfortunately, taxpayers in Olive will face an estimated 25% increase in County taxes.  While we vocally opposed and fought this decision, please let us offer a snapshot of the history of this debate in the Legislature. 
            First, the General Services Standing Committee, which oversees the Ulster County Real Property Service, decided not to adopt this new law 2 years in a row.  This year was different.  The Chairwoman of General Services Committee, at the request of Majority Leader Michael Stock, attempted to circumvent the law and committee process by doing a telephone poll to bring the a vote to the floor of the legislature.  To make matters worse, no Democrat on that committee was asked for their vote on the Large Parcel Law.  This was a clear and obvious violation of the New York State Open Meetings Law.  The public was not invited to listen to those telephone calls and no minutes were taken.  Majority Leader Stock made certain that this measure was voted and adopted by the full legislature.  However, we would like to thank three Republican Legislators, Susan Cummings and Gerald Depew and Brian Hathaway, for their unyielding courage to break ranks and vote their conscience. 
            The Large Parcel Law creates a situation that increases taxes by placing an unfair burden on all taxpayers in towns, such as Olive, across New York State.  New York City owns more than 53% of the total land in Olive.  We are in the belief that New York City's money should stay in Olive ˆ and not spread throughout other towns in communities.  That said, we are very thankful that the entire Olive Town Board attended the meeting and spoke out against this increase. 
            This entire process confirms a very compelling and valid point.  The current method of raising taxes based on property value is a mistake and in need of reform.  This is why we have finished authoring a memorializing resolution to Governor Pataki and the entire State Legislature ˆ asking them to develop and implement an alternative means for funding education and government.  We plan on officially introducing this resolution near the end of the month.
            Thank you for your time and attention,
                                    Robert S. Parete                                                     Peter Kraft                               Richard A. Parete
Ulster County Legislators, District 3



Dear Editor,
            The recent decision of the Ulster County Legislature to adopt the large parcel tax code sounds a death knell for many homeowners in my community. Our representatives have a responsibility to fully examine any resolution to determine its effects, not just on their respective districts, but on the entire county, as well. Any legislation, especially one designed to avoid wild tax swings, which causes undue hardship to a small community of homeowners must be flawed in nature or application. 
            How, in good conscience, can any county representative approve a bill that unduly burdens a small number of the populace with a 28 percent increase in county taxes? It is unconscionable that these legislators felt compelled to act on this bill, fully cognizant of the hardship already imposed on Olive residents by the recent 50 percent increase in school taxes.
            Majority Leader Michael Stock proposed this vote, as "an issue of equity." In an email, he wrote, "We at the Legislature and the Onteora School District gave Olive one year to get its house in order to correct the inequity of your real estate values, which they failed to do." 
            I'm sorry, Mr. Stock -- this issue is not as clear-cut as Olive's failure to "get its house in order" -- every nonpartisan official who has publicly commented on implementing the large parcel has noted the complexities involved.  His stale and simplistic rhetoric of how a home valued at $100,000 in the town of Olive should be as equally taxed as a $100,000 home in Shandaken or Woodstock fails to recognize fundamental differences.  
            Olive residents are directly impacted by DEP regulations on our roadways and property rights. Olive has borne the brunt of the legal costs over the years of wrangling with NYC regarding tax assessment and road maintenance. Should everybody reap the "benefits" of the large parcel reservoir, when Olive property owners bear the onus of the regulations and restrictions? 
            Does Mike Stock believe his constituents will be well served by the animosity this bill is creating between our communities?  Many people in Olive are considering seceding from the school district because of this contentious issue ˆ are these the neighborly relations he encourages? 
            Held to the same argument, as chair of the commission overseeing the $21 million cost overrun at the new jail, how much time should the taxpayers afford Mike Stock to get his "house in order?" Perhaps Mr. Stock's time as county legislator would be wiser spent resolving this costly blunder, rather than rabidly seeking ways to undermine his neighbors. 
            While I'm thankful for my district representatives, Rob Parete, Rich Parete and Peter Kraft, and for members of Olive Town Board, whose impassioned pleas against this legislation fell on partisan ears, I'm also saddened that politics in this county reflect the polemics of the country. 
 Paula Rittmiller-Sirc
Shokan, NY

Dear Editor,                                                               Remember this quote? "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." (G.W. Bush, 9/13/01). But then just six months later, on March 13, 2002, President Bush is quoted as saying, "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." Talk about flip-flopping˜his repeatedly hollow accusation against Kerry! But that's another thing.                                                       Remember Baghdad Bob? You know, the rimless bespecled, black beret-topped Iraqi Minister of Information, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, who, at the beginning of the war on Iraq, grew to become a cult-like figure? In the Minister's parallel universe, things were always fine. In the face of all reality and evidence to the contrary, an incredulous al-Sahaf continued as if he was in denial about the war.                     Sound like anybody else we know?
Al-Sahaf was not subtle either. He never went for the believable lies; instead he went for the downright outrageous ones. "The Americans say their coalition troops are in Baghdad," he said, addressing the press outside the damaged walls of the shelled out Ministry of Information building where heavy fighting could still be heard. "These things, they are American lies. They are not even within 100 miles of Baghdad." When asked about coalition planes witnessed landing at Sadam International airport, he challenged these sightings. "What planes? These claims that the Americans have the ability to fly are pure myth. Do not believe these preposterous tales of flight." In an age of spin, al-Sahaf's lunatic counterfactual art reached a fever pitch when Iraqi soldiers began surrendering. "Those are not Iraqi soldiers at all. Where did they bring them from?"                                       Al-Sahaf is now said to be in hiding, and there have been dozens of reported sightings of the Minister all over the globe. But you know what I think? I think he's been spirited away to Washington to coach George W. and head up the administration's spin team. In fact, come to think of it, they might have been sharing scripts along. From that moment of blustering arm-chair machismo when Bush said, "Bring them on," and two weeks later, "When I take action, I'm not going to fire a 2 million dollar missile at a 10 dollar empty tent and hit a camel in the butt. It's going to be decisive" to al-Sahaf's "God will roast their stomachs in hell at the hands of Iraqis." Like al-Sahaf, and always with a straight face, Bush's message is consistent, unshakeable. No matter what the mounting evidence, George W. tells us that everything is going well in Iraq; we're on schedule. And, like al-Sahaf, he never seems bothered when the lie's he's telling the world are revealed for the whoppers that they are.                                                                      The Iraqi Minister of Information became an unlikely hero in those first weeks of the war with his rich and colorful invectives ("Who are in control, they are not in control of anything˜they don't even know how to control themselves!"), old-fashioned name calling ("The midget Bush and that Rumsfeld deserve only to be beaten with shoes by loving people everywhere") and denials ("I triple guarantee you, there are no American soldiers in Baghdad" and "I blame al-Jazeera˜they are marketing for the Americans!"). You almost had to admire the guy for his unintentional comic relief in the face of an overwhelming brutal invasion and its impending chaos. "These cowards have no morals," he said at one point, "They have no shame in lying."                                                                         George W. is equally ridiculous: "The war on terror involves Saddam Hussein because of the nature of Saddam Hussein, the history of Saddam Hussein, and his willingness to terrorize himself." (Grand Rapids, Mich., Jan. 29, 2003) Huh? (Al-Sahaf may have had it almost right when he said, "I speak better English than this villain Bush!") But Bush's tall tales and blatant denials, his misleading rhetoric and hyped intelligence, along with their disastrous consequences, are not funny and the American public doesn't know what to believe about what is going on in Iraq anymore.  Maybe, like James L. Hirsen of FirstLiberties said of al-Sahaf, "[he] is so consistent in his fabrication, if we take as true the opposite of what he spouts, he becomes downright reliable."                                          One thing we do know is this: The Emperor has no clothes. By all accounts, things are a horrific mess in Iraq. And military success is not determined through battlefield outcomes, but politically. But the Bush administration is still hell-bent on substituting a military solution for a political one, in large part because there never was a political solution to begin with. Perhaps we should have been listening more carefully when in 1989 George W. Bush said, "You know, I could run for governor but I'm basically a media creation. I've never done anything. I've worked for my dad. I worked in the oil business. But that's not the kind of profile you have to have to get elected to public office."                                                     It's claimed that the last quote from the memorable Baghdad Bob before he went on "administrative leave" was, "I now inform you that you are too far from reality." Exactly the message we should be sending˜loud and clear˜to Washington.                                                        Barbara Ellis                                               Boiceville, NY

Dear Editor,
            The President wants us to believe that governmental control of Health Care   would cost too much!!! It would cost him and many legislators the huge amount of money   and political support  which Health Care and Pharmaceutical Industries provide them. It would SAVE   the American people and our government huge amounts of money. Of every dollar spent by us for our health care insurance over fifty cents goes to profit and to advertising. The government is not being asked to pay for health care insurance, only to administer it . (The health care coverage  now paid for by the Government  for veterans et. al would cost the Government far less.) The money  for health Care insurance would come from individuals, employers, and organizations to  which we belong  . The difference is it would cost  far less and everyone would be covered.  Forty five . millions have no coverage now.      Dealing with the diverse companies and plans is costly for the health care providers because of the great amount of book work involved.   And   having  many plans means a smaller number covered by each plan drives  up the cost of the premiums per capita.
     .  With the government at the helm prices of drugs could be negotiated and the cost of medical care would be drastically reduced   The pharmaceutical  industry to make profits  way and above that of other  industries. We are paying for their TV and other ads. And many advertised drugs are no more effective than older ones that were widely used.  Advertising  is where the  biggest  money goes, research.
       As Senator Kerry pointed out reduction in health benefits employer pay  would enable our manufacturers  to stay competitive  with those in other countries and we would not need to take jobs abroad .
        We can help  the United States to attain a National Health  Insurance plan by supporting the incumbent and aspiring legislators who support Universal Health  Care.
      In the 20th congressional District there is a very capable, far sighted woman running for Congress  who is supporting it. She is    Doris Kelly  and her election would be most helpful in  support of  good health care as  well as for good government all around.     If she  were elected . She cares about us. She cares that the    World Health Organization ranks us as 37th  in meeting the health needs  of  our nation  
Mescal E. Hornbeck
Woodstock,  NY
                                                        
Dear Editor,
            I want to share my experience with Judge Mary Work with you.  I have been before her in Family Court on two occasions as the plaintiff, once on custody issues and the last time on financial issues. 
            Judge Work was commanding and intelligent as well as being compassionate in discharging her duties.  My first experience with Judge Work resulted in an agreement between the parties.  The second time we relied on Judge Work to decide financial issues related to the welfare of our children.  She accommodated us by working around our difficult scheduling issues, due to one of the parties being out of town every other week, in order to get the case heard.  In terms of the financial issues that were the subject of the case, Judge Work handled the complexity of our situation valuing past, present and projected assets in a fair and equitable manner.  Yes, I did say in a fair and equitable manner.  Her decision was just that.  As the plaintiff I was satisfied with the decision; that is to say I liked some parts and disliked others.  I believe the defendant felt the same.  It was a fair decision.
            What I expect from the judiciary is a timely and fair hearing before an intelligent human being, and a timely and fair decision in accordance with the law.  Judge Work delivers.
                                    Lisa Cutten
Kingston, NY

Dear Editor,
            I had the pleasure and privilege of living next door to Judge Paul Gruner and his wonderful family for almost twenty-five years. I find him to be a conscientious and dedicated professional, a loving and attentive husband and a sensitive caring parent.
            During our years as neighbors our families became very close. Our daughters always looked up to and respected Paul as if he was their uncle. Whenever we needed assistance of any kind he was the first person at our door to offer.
            Here is a man that has all of the qualities we look for and need in our elected officials today. He was born and raised in Ulster County and chose to practice law and live here. He is a family man, he practices his religion, he is a good friend, and he has successful in all of his endeavors in the legal field.
            My vote for Surrogate Judge on November 2 will be to keep Judge Gruner.
Bonnie Brown
Kingston, NY

Dear Editor,
            In the third and final Presidential debate Bob Schieffer, CBS anchor, asked President Bush the following question. I would like to ask you, what part does your faith play on your policy decisions?
            Mr. Bush said, first my faith plays a lot -- a big part in my life. And that's when I was answering that question, what I was really saying to the person was that I pray a lot. And I do. And my faith is a very -- it's very personal. I pray for strength. I pray for wisdom. I pray for our troops in harm's way. I pray for my family. I pray for my little girls. But I'm mindful in a free society that people can worship if they want to or not. You're equally an American if you choose to worship an almighty and if you choose not to. If you're a Christian, Jew or Muslim, you're equally an American. That's the great thing about America, is the right to worship the way you see fit.
            That was a pretty good political answer, but I wonder if Mr. Bush prayed before he sent our troops in harm's way. I don't understand how anyone can send young men and women to war and then pray for them. What is he praying for? I wonder if he's praying for a quick way to get out of Iraq to end this terrible unnecessary war and to save young lives. I didn't hear him say that he was praying for all the Iraqi people that's been killed or wounded from our Military weapons and 500 pound bombs or the families of all the troops that have been killed. His most frequent prayer is probably that he wins the election.
William Warnecke
Glenford, NY

Dear Editor,
       I think that Supreme Court Justices Rehnquist, Scalia, O'Connor, Thomas and Kennedy, Governor Jeb Bush and then Secretary of State Katherine Harris, lawyers Baker, Olsen, et al, should share in the responsibility for over a thousand Americans killed and many thousands injured and maimed, and unnumbered thousands of Iraqi killed and seriously injured, especially the children, the Inno–cents, not only the dead and disabled and the many who have been affected emotionally and psychologically. Then, of course, there is George W. Bush, who was so pleased to be a war presi–dent.
Bob Jacobson
Mt. Tremper, NY

Dear Editor,
       I finally figured it all out and it comes down to one word, greed.  It seems the only way anyone can be elected in our powerful nation of wealth and riches is to make one central promise "I Will NOT Raise Taxes!"  How selfish are we?  I am 38 years old and have been steadily employed since I was 14.  Not by luck or privilege, but by honor, integrity and resilience.  My average annual salary over 24 years has been under $30,000.00, yet through hard work, compassion, respect and love, I have managed to live with everything I need.  Why should I deserve more than my brother or my sister, and why should I deserve less?  Though I am not financially wealthy, I vow to contribute all I can.  So let me be one the first brave enough to say, please raise my taxes, just hear my voice.  Please raise my taxes, just respect my choice.  Please raise my taxes, just be fair.  Please raise my taxes, just remember the only true economy is water, soil, seeds and air.  Please raise my taxes, just protect our Mother Earth.  Please raise my taxes, just teach our children form birth.  Please raise my taxes, just honor our elder's words.  Please raise my taxes, just nurture the fishes, plants and birds.  Please raise my taxes, just care for the ill.  Please raise my taxes, just don't use them to kill.  Please raise my taxes, just respect everyone's right to live.  Please raise my taxes, just try to forgive.  Please raise my taxes, just comfort the abused.  Please raise my taxes, just enlighten the confused.  Please raise my taxes, just raise them with love for the world, the one that each of us has the power to preserve.
       With hope,
David J. Turan
Stamford, NY

Dear Editor,
            I'm not opposed to giving credit where credit is due, but characterizing our relationship with the DEP as a "marriage" seems a bit naive.  You suggest that it was all Ward's doing that got us the reval and "not anything our local politicians will have done."  You say that local people who see our relationship as one of conflict "just don't GET this concept of a working partnership." 
     Are you saying that the reval happened just because they gave it to us when we asked them nice?  You think the "partnership" is something the city just wants to have with us because they are good neighbors or something?  Are you aware of the years of effort our supervisor has made to get reservoir towns to join in sharing the legal fees necessary to fight the city's assessment claims?   Do you think the city made their move without an awareness that a judge would be forcing them to split the difference with us in court? 
            Your suggestion that the efforts of our leaders is nothing in comparison to the generosity of some Harvard grad social reformer seems to reflect a bias.  I'm sure our town's leaders deserve and would appreciate a little more credit for their part in the love\hate relationship we have with the city.
Jim Ulrich
Olive, NY

Dear Editor,
            Our son was deployed in the Persian Gulf for 14 months during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. With the on-going heated political debate over the issue, many people have asked us what he has to say about the war in Iraq and the Middle East situation,                                                                                First of all, he is disturbed over the lack of coverage of all the good that the servicemen and women have accomplished in bringing freedom and basic services to the Iraqi people He also dislikes the media's use of the tem1 "insurgents" and the portrayal that the war in Iraq is a diversion from the war on terrorism. He points out that we are not fighting the Republican Guard, Iraqi Army, or the Iraqi people. Instead, our forces are fighting TERRORISTS who are coming into Iraq from other countries Following the tragic events of 9-11, our nation wanted our military to bring the fight to terrorists on their soil. So why now is their so much opposition to our military fighting terrorists in Iraq?                  While our son was serving overseas he sent me a shirt which I proudly wear. It reads "My Deployed Son Supports Operation Iraqi Freedom." While he was there, he learned first hand that there are three things, above all others, that enable a soldier to withstand the hardships they must endure and be successful in their mission. They are: faith in God, love and support from friends and family back home, and the shared belief with the American public that their sacrifice is for a great purpose. Taking away any one of these is devastating to a soldier and makes the hardships they are enduring insurmountable.                                                                   After learning these lessons first hand and knowing what the soldiers still in Iraq and the Middle East are going through, it upsets our son to hear a potential Commander-in-Chief say that this is, "The wrong war at the wrong place at the wrong time". Comments like these, he says, take away the soldier's sense of purpose in their mission and the cause. It makes the sacrifices they must endure no longer seem worthwhile. And it draws a clear distinction between who is fit and unfit for command.                                                                                                       Joe & Marge Tiso
                                      Mt. Tremper, NY

Dear Editor,
            We are very happy to acknowledge and applaud Senator John Bonacic's leadership in obtaining $750,000 for improvements at the Belleayre Mountain Ski Center and continue the resurgence of the main economic engine of the entire route 28 corridor. Senator Bonacic's efforts go beyond just obtaining funding.            Since he has begun representing this region in Albany, the economic vitality of the Central Catskills number one economic asset, Belleayre, has always been one of his major priorities. His nickname in our area is the Senator for all seasons for a resort for all seasons.
            The Belleayre community remembers too well the days when all the winter recreational monies went to the North Country, and our area suffered. We hope that those days are well behind us and the proof that it is money well spent is the vast increase in skier visits under Superintendent Tony Lanza's leadership.  The present Belleayre Ski Center was built to accommodate a maximum 100,000 skier visits per year.  Last year we had 175,000.  We need to upgrade our facilities just to handle the crowds we presently service.  This allocation provides the stimulus for us to move forward. We need to look and plan for the new Belleayre. We need to maintain the momentum of the past 5 years for our region to continue to compete for the tourist dollar in a highly competitive industry.  Each increase in skier visits is an economic shot in the arm to our region, our businesses, and our tax base. This is one issue our entire community supports and believes in.
            Kudos to our Senator! He's a breath of fresh mountain air direct from The Catskills...
Joseph F Kelly, Chairman
Coalition To Save Belleayre

Dear Editor,
            The Onteora Central School District Board of Education has endorsed my recommendation, to establish a District Wide Communications Committee.
            The Purpose of the Communications Committee is to develop a comprehensive communications plan and to improve communications between all stakeholders in the Onteora School District.
 
This Committee, will report directly and make recommendations to the Board of Education.  Our first meeting is scheduled for Wednesday November 10th, 2004, at 7:00pm in the MS/HS cafeteria.
            The intent is for all stakeholders within the District to be represented on the Committee or through Sub-Committees.  Our goal is to look at ways to engage the community in a more positive and efficient manner by way of the District website, newsletters, DVD formatted presentations and the formation of District wide groups.
            Anyone interested should contact Jeane Shultis, Onteora District Clerk, phone 845-657-8851, jshultis@onteora.k12.ny.us or myself, onteoraparent04@yahoo.com .
David J. Patterson, Trustee
Onteora CSD Board of Education

Dear Editor,
            When my kid started 7th grade at Onteora he joined the soccer team. He told me about A & B teams & that his coach said that if the students made the practices & other requirements that they would be guaranteed to play at least 2 quarters of every game because that was the rule. After the third game, Cory told me he only got to play for a few minutes of one quarter but the coach promised he would play the first quarter of the next game. I arrived at the next game during the second quarter. Cory told me he had not yet played. There was a cold breeze, I gave him my coat & went back to my truck. As of this writing, Cory has not played 1 full quarter in the last 3 games. Mr. DiGiovanni (athletic director) told me Onteora doesn't follow the rules because the other schools don't cooperate with the rules. This morning Cory told me they played Wallkill yesterday. Wallkill played A & B teams by the rules. Cory told me his team doesn't even have an A & B team. No intention of trying to follow the rules? No intention of trying to comply with the intent of the rule? (all the kids get to play at least 2 quarters per game) Is winning more important than making an honest effort to try to follow rules? Is lying & breaking rules a good role model for children?
            On Thursday morning I tried to talk to the new Superintendent, Ms. Winters, because Mr. DiGiovanni failed to return my phone call the previous day. Ms. Winters was unavailable. Mr. DiGiovanni called sometime later that day. After Mr. DiGiovanni failed to assure me the rules would be followed, I tried again to talk to Ms. Winters at about 10 a.m. Friday morning. I was promised she would call right after the meeting she was in. About 3:30 p.m. when Ms. Winters finally got time to talk to me, she scolded & threatened me on a speakerphone with two other people on her end. They told me they had to check with the school attorney to see if they had to follow the rules. They gave me no assurance that they would make sure the rules were followed in the future. All the kids should get to play. Follow the rules, be a good role model. Look in the eyes of the kids on the bench. Somebody please promise me all the kids will get to play. That an honest effort will be made to let all the kids play at least 2 quarters per game as per the intent of the rules.
William DeVoe
Cory Schmidt
Woodstock, NY

Dear Editor,
            Family of Woodstock is preparing its next training session for crisis hotline volunteers at the walk-in center on Rock City Rd. Let me tell you why I volunteer at the center one morning each week.
            Especially in these times, there are many among us who need someone to talk to and there are people who are homeless or down on their luck and in need of a bag of food... those who are less fortunate than myself. At Family I've had the opportunity to be one tiny candle in the darkness, to listen when someone's heart was breaking with grief or when another was despondent or in trouble or just confused. To just be there with the person, even if only on the phone. To not judge, but rather to encourage. And being helpful is certainly not one sided. I have learned that I seldom do anything better for myself than to give a part of me away.
            Thirty-four hours of training will prepare you for this experience and it begins soon. If you think you would like to become a member of the team of volunteers at Family and can commit to one three- or four-hour shift each week, days or evenings, please call us at 679-2485 or 338-2370.
David Griffin, volunteer
Woodstock, NY

Dear Editor,
            According to press reports, an attorney representing the opponents to the Belleayre Resort project recently colluded with one legislator and introduced a bill calling for a new and impossibly stringent environmental review process to which Crossroads Ventures might be subjected. There was a clear effort in the measure's wording and presentation to mislead our county legislators into taking an inappropriate action designed to sway a judge in the midst of his judicial review.
            This should be particularly disturbing to everyone in Ulster County. If this kind of chicanery were to be resorted to in the case of every potential economic development, all development would come to a screeching halt. Projects which might otherwise prove most advantageous for our economy would move elsewhere - either within the state borders or beyond.
            Thankfully, the legislature recognized the potential disaster of the phrase "full adjudication" which would have altered the meaning of an otherwise responsible resolution. However, regardless of the issue, such an underhanded attempt to mislead elected public officials runs counter to those values we respect in Ulster County.
            That unsatisfied opponents of the project seek to short circuit the lengthy and comprehensive review process currently in the hands of an administrative law judge is bad enough. That they would stoop to misrepresentation and stealth tactics fo fool our county legislators is even worse.
            Let the full review continue without political pressure and allow the duly appointed judge, who has heard all sides and has extensive information upon which to base a decision, do so without misleading cries for "full adjudication."
Steven Thomas
Pine Hill, NY

Dear Editor,
            Mandatory Candidate Pre-Election Seminar
            The annual Non-Partisan Candidate Pre-Election Seminar is being held this month and is mandatory.  Please make time to attend so that you may fine tune your vote getting skills and be better prepared for the continued quality of your performance as a public servant:
            The following is some of the many subjects that will be discussed in depth:
            -The Primal Shrug
            - Ego Gratification Through Deceit
             -Lying Your Way Up The Political Ladder.
             -Improving Elected Office Skills Through A High Fiber Diet.
            -Bonsai Your Adversaries.
            -How Two Say "Yes,You're Right, I'll Look Into It" With A Straight Face.
            -500 ways Of Saying What You Don't Mean.
            -Ten Days To No Ethics.
            -How To Give 10 People The Same Job.
            -How To Convert The Village Church To A Casino For The Evening.
            -The Heimlich Method Of Getting Your Wife To Lie For You.
            -No-Guilt Influence Peddling.
            As always, refreshments will be served so make sure to get there early while the Pizza is still hot.
Dominick LoGuidice
Big Indian, NY

Dear Editor,
            I am writing to support the Library Funding proposition on the ballot this November 2.  This proposed yearly funding increase for the Phoenicia Library and the Morton Memorial Library totals $6343.  The money will be used to cover rising costs of purchasing books and running the libraries and their computers.
            In the past four years, our libraries have expanded their hours of operation and computerized their book circulation system.  I can sit at home at my computer and order a book from any library in the mid-Hudson Valley and it will be delivered to the Phoenicia Library for me! A vast quantity of books is right at my fingertips -- it's wonderful. 
            Everyone who uses the libraries has their own reason for loving them -- whether it's Story Hour for children,  books to read, internet access, the Summer Reading program for school-age children, or the friendly staff who assist children and adults with research. Our libraries are an important part of our community.  So let's all support our two town libraries and vote to give them this very modest increase in funding.
Elizabeth Holland Kern
Phoenicia, NY

Dear Editor,
            A couple of weeks ago my neighbor, Jackie Kukle came to get me to catch an eagle that was just sitting on the road by her house. I gathered my raptor gloves, heavy towels, nets and a large dog kennel, scolding myself for not having bought the large bird net that would handle an eagle, and took off down the road trying to keep myself centered so that I might somehow catch an eagle with a butterfly net and a towel. Arriving at Jackie's house, I found Woodstock Police and several people waiting. They had chased the bird into the woods trying to catch her or get her off the road. I asked the policemen to help me, knowing that it is a piece of work to catch such a bird even if they can't fly. I passed towels around and we went into the woods. There she was sitting on a log: a truly huge and magnificent female red tail hawk. She was only a few months old because she still had her new brown tail feathers. The red tails don't come until the second year.
            She didn't have an obvious injury. I felt that I might be able to catch her if I approached obliquely and very slowly with a calm energy. I asked the others to step back as I moved closer. There had to be something terribly wrong for me to be within ten feet of her. She wasn't alert looking about for an escape. Her eyes were cast down and her expression was one of misery. I let her feel my energy before taking each step as she was looking away. When I was within four feet she turned around to face me. There was a resignation in her eyes. Gently, gently I moved up to her showing her my bath towel "skirt" that I had wrapped around me. When I saw and felt that she acquiesced I carefully raised the towel and dropped it over her, scooping her up in my arms. Oh my, she weighed no more than a crow! How did such a young hawk get so emaciated?
            Everyone was relieved that I had caught her and there were many wishes for her recovery and her life. This was not to be. Despite our best efforts the female red tail hawk whose name was Phoenix did not make it. She died the next afternoon. Her story is a familiar one to wildlife rehabilitators and naturalists. You see Phoenix died of mouse poison. She is at the NY State Pathology lab where her tissues are being sampled to check for the poison that kills so many wild ones every year. This is how it works: people put out the tiny green pellets of mouse or rat poison in their attics and basements. The mice collect the sweet smelling pellets and save many of them, but eat one. The mouse or mice leave the house desperate for air as their systems close down from the poison. The hawks, owls and the snakes see the weak mouse and eat it. A few days later they are in the same state as the mouse. They are bigger so their death takes longer, but eventually their blood vessels dilate and the blood leaks out. It leaks out of their hearts, too. They die a sad, miserable death. Along comes a crow, a vulture or a raven, the carrion eaters. They eat the hawk or the owl. They too will die of this poison that is made for mice and rats. And so on.
            Her name was Phoenix. This is an opportunity to give her life again to match her name. Please go through your storage areas and gather up this poison and triple bag it before taking it to the RRA for toxic disposal. There are so many mousetraps in this world, there is surely no longer a need for a poison such as this. The hawk, the owl and the snake are among our natural rodent control devices in this world. Obviously, the poison is also extremely dangerous for children, adults and for our pets as well as for our community water supply.
Kristine Flones
Ravensbeard Wildlife Center
Bearsville, NY