|
|
Follow
Up on the News
The first
public meeting on the proposed changes being mulled for the state Route
28 corridor will be held by the Central Catskills Collaborative, put together
for the spending of $500,000 in state Smart Growth funds this past Spring,
at 6 p.m. Wednesday, June 25, at the Catskill Center for Conservation
and Development in Arkville.
There, state Deputy Secretary of State Robert Elliott will discuss “Intermunicipal
Cooperation and Smart Growth,” officials said.
Elliott founded the Historic River Towns of Westchester County, a 13-community
consortium focused on waterfront development, tourism and Main Street
economics. As deputy secretary of state, he serves on New York’s
Smart Growth Cabinet, an interagency initiative created by executive order
of then-Gov. Eliot Spitzer in December.
The Central Catskills Collaborative is a group of six towns and villages
along the corridor in Delaware and Ulster counties. Andes, Fleischmanns,
Middletown and Margaretville are among them.
“This stems from the push to help the upstate economy,” said
Middletown board member Donald Kearney of the new push. “We have
been discussing the development of a scenic byway and coming up with some
kind of uniform advertising and developing ideas like a scenic bicycle
route.”
Peter Manning, the Catskill Center’s regional planner, said the
group has been engaged “in a regional dialogue focused on protecting
and promoting the scenic, cultural, historic, and economic well being
of the Route 28 corridor and the central Catskills.”
The state-sponsored Central Catskill Mountains/Park Smart Growth Program
was announced in April, and made $500,000 available for local improvement
projects along the Route 28 corridor and in the hamlets. They have since
developed recommendations to improve economic activities while sustaining
the Catskills’ sense of place, including improved interpretation
of and access to the Catskill Forest Preserve; greater CCC participation
in rail corridor revitalization; Exploring the creation of a scenic byway;
Pursuing intermunicipal funding opportunities; engaging educational institutions
to assist the CCC in its objectives; Regular communication with DEC and
DOT; and Implementing recommendations from previous planning documents.
In a recent interview, DEC Regional Director Willi Janeway said that although
it was premature to speak of the new discussions in terms of proper Scenic
Byway planning, the current talks came after his agency and others, “Had
invited these towns from Hurley into Delaware County whether they were
interested in sitting together to discuss scenic byway possibilities.
We wanted to know if they were conceptually interested… and they
were.”
He added that, should the towns collectively want to move forward with
further collaboration involving the corridor, “WE are prepared to
help move this along,” including helping for formal designations
withg the DOT and other agencies, and the marshalling of future monetrary
resources for projects.
“There’s no great rush,” Janeway concluded. “But
so far a majority of the towns have said yes.”
Under Scenic Byway designations, the state program everyone’s talking
about refers to a system of collaboration, between municipalities and
governments and the public, designed to accentuate a roadway’s tourism
potential. Corridor Management Plana require sign regulations akin to
those already existing in the Catskill Park, sign inventories, resolutions
of support from local government partners; and a shared sense of protection
for the beauty and safety of the designated roadway.
The term dates back to a 1991 federal program designed to protect historically
scenic US routes and promote them for new tourism. 99 such designations
currently exist.
More information on whatever programs apply will be brought forward as
the joint partners progress with their planning, or not, in the coming
months.
The current efforts are being undertaken with input from the DEC, CCCD
and Catskill Watershed Corporation.
Stay tuned…
Decision
Overturned
Woodland Community Association president Carol Seitz said Tuesday that
the decision, reached last year following an eight year local battle for
project promoter Andrew Poncic, is rendered moot by this appeal verdict.
“I am pleased to announce that I have heard from our lawyers at
Hogan & Hartson and we have proven successful in our appeal,”
said Seitz in a prepared statement. “The Appellate Division of the
State of New York Supreme Court agreed with us that the Town of Shandaken
Planning Board overstepped their jurisdiction by attempting to interpret
zoning law, something that only the Zoning Board of Appeals is authorized
to do.”
Without a ruling from the zoning board, Seitz wrote, the planning board
had no authority to grant Poncic’s Good Water Corporation a special
use permit a year and a half ago.
In a June 12th decision Justice Robert S. Rose wrote that the appeal decision
hinged on the fact that Poncic’s plan called for non potable water
being drawn from his site, not water for bottling. The towns zoning code
needed to be interpreted by the zoning board to determine whether a special
permit could be issued for such a project. Rose wrote that last year the
Supreme Court made the interpretation instead.
“(The) Supreme Court did not address this issue of whether the Planning
Board was authorized to interpret the Code. Rather, the court justified
the grant of a special permit by its own interpretation of the Code’s
provision regarding water bottling to include the use proposed by Good
Water. However, because the Code makes clear that such an interpretation
is for the ZBA to make in the first instance and the ZBA has not done
so here, the court’s reading of the Code’s provision was premature,”
Rose wrote.
Rose noted that during the projects review process opponents of the project
called the Planning Board’s attention to these provisions and the
boards obligation to request an interpretation of the Code from the Zoning
Board, the Planning Board made no such request and instead determined
on its own that Good Water’s application was for a permitted use.
The WCA filed a lawsuit against the town after the permit was issued,
and lost. State Supreme Court Justice John C. Egan Jr. issued his decision
in the matter last July, stating that the Shandaken Planning Board acted
appropriately when it issued the approval in the fall of 2006.
“The planning board undertook the requisite hard look analysis of
the environmental impact of the project and arrived at a well reasoned
conclusion in approving the same,” he wrote.
The plan by part time Valley resident Andrew Poncic to draw two truckloads
of a day water from a spring near the head of the dead end Woodland Valley
road in Phoenicia was given the go ahead by the Shandaken Planning board
in October 2006 after a six year review. Hisses and boo’s from the
audience were heard at the session when the planners gave Poncic the green
light. Following the 5-1 vote, one woman shouted “shame on you”
to the majority of the board that supported the project. The lawsuit was
filed immediately and opponents felt confident that they had a case.
Justice Egan disagreed, dismissing the case on the merits.
“The court finds that the collection and hauling of non-potable
water falls within the category of permitted uses under “water bottling
and related uses” and it was within the planning boards jurisdiction
to grant good water a special permit,” the judge wrote in his 16
page decision.
“The project cannot be rejected simply on the basis of community
pressure and there must be substantial evidence demonstrating the nature
and magnitude of any undesirable impacts.” He wrote.
Now, Seitz said, the permit is voided and the case will be sent back to
the State Supreme Court who, in turn, will send it back to the Planning
Board. The Planning Board must then refer the matter to the Zoning board
for consideration on whether harvesting water for entirely non-potable
uses is sufficiently similar to water bottling and related uses to merit
a special use permit.
“If and when that determination is made, the Board will have an
opportunity to consider Poncic’s application anew,” she said.
The WCA feels the project would have made the roadway unsafe due to the
trucks going back and forth.
Attempts to get in touch with Shandaken Planning Board chairpersons past
and present received no comments as of presstime.
Another
Fiery Issue
The new laws,
they say, are the result of shifts in the types of items people are burning,
especially in rural areas, causing possible health dangers to the general
population. As well as the increasing potential for wildfires being pushed
by growing dry conditions tied to Climate Change.
And already they’re producing steam from local folk, especially
in the rural Route 28 corridor towns of Olive and Shandaken, where former
Woodstock Police Chief Rich Ostrander has started sounding the alert on
what’s happening, and what could happen as a result.
“We will be looking at public comments over the coming months,”
DEC Region 4 Director Willi Janeway said of the statewide regulatory changes
set for public hearings to start June 24. “It is typical for us
to revise proposals based on public reaction.”
“I have spoken to many contractors in the area and no one knows
about the changes. There will be substantial cost increases for homeowners
and contractors alike,” wrote former Woodstock Police Chief Rich
Ostrander of Boiceville in a recent e-mail (see hisletter, and a missive
from the Olive Town Board, in the letters section inside). “I personally
think this is a very important issue for a rural area and it is going
to hit like a ton of bricks.”
In what they say is an effort to reduce the impacts of pollutants such
as dioxins, particulate matter and carbon monoxide and to limit the risks
of wildfires, the DEC proposed in early May to extend a ban on open burning
statewide beyond the current ban for any municipality with a population
of 20,000 or more, a law in effect since 1972, to include the entire state.
Once considered harmless, DEC has reported that open burning has been
found to release more dangerous chemicals into the air than thought generations
ago. They cite a recent study by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
undertaken in conjunction with DEC and the State Department of Health,
that found that emissions of dioxins and furans from backyard burning
alone were greater than all other sources combined for the years 2002-04.
The study also found that burning trash emits arsenic, carbon monoxide,
benzene, styrene, formaldehyde, lead, hydrogen cyanide and other harmful
chemicals. Trash containing plastics, polystyrene, pressure-treated and
painted wood and bleached or colored papers can produce harmful chemicals
when burned.
In addition to releasing pollutants, it was found that open burning is
the largest single cause of wildfires in New York State such as that which
destroyed a large chunk of the Minnewaska area earlier this Spring. Data
from DEC’s Forest Protection Division show that debris burning accounted
for about 40 percent of wildfires between 1986 and 2006 - more than twice
the next most-cited source. The proposed rule does allow for a number
of exceptions, including 3 foot radius camp fires, celebratory bonfires
(where allowed), fire training exercises, specialized burning to protect
crops from frostbite and burning of agricultural wastes (though not agricultural
plastics). But according to Ostrander, officials he spoke to about the
new regs in Albany told him, “You’re not going to be able
to light a newspaper on fire in this state after this,” in regards
to the proposals.
Ostrander said this week that he has been telling many local contractors
as he can about what’s happening, because he feels it will hit that
industry particularly hard, forcing site clearings to resort to burying
wood debris or hauling it away for disposal.
“The cost of a chipper’s averaging over $700 a day,”
he said. “That’s a sizable expense.”
In addition, he worries about private citizens who regularly burn brush,
as he does at his home. He’s unsure local landfills or the county
Rural Resource Recovery Agency are prepared to handle the new loads it
would have to deal with.
“The DEC believes that the private sector will solve the technical
problems,” Janeway said when told of difficulties people are having
with the DEC’s suggestion that local landfills incinerate local
woods trash. “They will in time produce outdoor boilers that pass
clean air standards. The old polluting units will age out over a predetermined
time period. They will not be grandfathered forever.”
In the laws themselves, the state proposes that eventual benefits will
outweigh immediate expenses.
“Due to the potential increase in the amount of household waste,
brush, and land clearing debris, communities may need to upgrade their
transfer facilities. Upgrades would primarily consist of large trash compactors
for household refuse, and wood chippers or tub grinders for brush and
land clearing debris,” the proposed law states. “Societal
savings of health related costs in affected rural areas should more than
make up for the increased costs of solid waste disposal. A single hospitalization
for asthma outside of New York City costs over $8,900 and the total cost
for asthma hospitalizations amounted to over $284 million in 2002.”
The law’s big aim, it states, is against so-called burn barrels,
still a major component of rural life in many places..
Ostrander said he thinks that, in the end, some compromise can be reached,
banning burn barrels, for example, while retaining a permit process for
burning brush. He added that he was planning to take his campaign to other
towns, the Catskill Watershed Corporation, the Coaliton of Watershed Towns
and other entities that could help make the proposed regulatory changes
less draconian.
Janeway, for his part, said the new laws were being less effected by Climate
Change policies than a reaction to “major shifts in the waste stream.”
Although he did say stemming burns in a dryer climate WAS important.
The state is currently conducting a series of public hearings on the proposal,
including one at 5 PM on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 at the Norrie Point Environmental
Center in Staatsburg, Staatsburg, two from 9:30 AM to noon and 5 to 8
PM on Wednesday, June 25, at DE’s Central Office, 625 Broadway,
Public Assembly Room 129, Albany, NY
It is important that folks be heard at these meetings, that they write
letters to the state about their thoughts regarding the proposed regulations,
and that they don’t just assume their local governments will affect
needed changes.
For more info visit www.dec.ny/gov.
“I was
looking for a small place to come to on weekends,” she recalls.
“I looked for eight months, and I finally started knocking on doors
and asking, ‘Can I buy your house?’ I found an old lady who
said yes. Then she died and left the house and her eighty poodles in limbo—she
was a poodle breeder. There was no way for me to get the house. I gave
up looking. Two months later, when my real estate wounds had healed, I
found a little house next to the building I own now. The realtor said
the post office building was also for sale. When I walked in, I fell in
love. It had been gutted, but it was lovely on the inside. The rest is
history.”
Leigh had just gone through yoga teacher training, so she figured she’d
teach a bit up here but spend most of her time in the city, where she
had been an actor for eighteen years. “I put up flyers, expecting
I’d get one or two people, but instead I had classes almost right
away. So I went for it. I followed it instead of struggling with it, and
it revealed itself.”
Her life as an actor, in contrast, had been “full of struggle and
hard knocks—I was used to things happening slowly and being really
difficult. I started taking yoga as part of acting training, and it changed
the way I performed. Yoga made it easy and allowed me to open as nothing
else did. Acting felt like fun for a change. I could lie backstage in
my costume with my legs up a wall until I went on.”
The transition to teaching yoga came as a response to the eternal dilemma
of the actor—how to find the right day job—heightened by her
role in South African writer Athol Fugard’s play Statements After
an Arrest Under the Immorality Act, which deals with the love affair of
a black man and white woman during the period of apartheid. “Both
characters are naked onstage and practically in the dark,” she explains.
“I was temping for a civil rights law firm half a block from the
theater, and the lawyers were coming to see the play. It was too hard
to deal with. I didn’t want a day job where my identity was so different
from my night job.”
Leigh is no longer acting professionally, although she hopes to go back
to it eventually. “I love my students, and I feel so fortunate that
I’ve been handed this gift. I’m just taking it and reveling
in it.” Chichester Yoga offers classes six days a week, with Tuesdays
off and Amy VanBlarcum teaching on Wednesdays, so Leigh can work with
private students in the city, some of whom take her classes in Chichester
on weekends.
Both Leigh and VanBlarcum have studied with Ana Forrest, a teacher now
in her early fifties, who developed a style of yoga that comes out of
work with physical therapists, chiropractors, bioenergetic therapists,
and hands-on healers. Born crippled, Forrest’s early life included
such challenges as physical abuse, drug addiction, alcoholism, epilepsy,
and bulimia. In her teens, says Leigh, Forrest discovered yoga and would
often go to classes drunk, but she used yoga to get sober and heal her
physical problems. “She called Sun Salutations her twelve-step program.
She would sometimes stay up all night doing Sun Salutations,” one
of the basic yoga exercises.
Working with one of her own students, clinical psychologist and Hunter
resident Dr. Cheryl Cornelius, Leigh has developed Asanapy, a healing
modality that combines yoga and group therapy. They lead group sessions
and private classes at the studio in Chichester and have students in New
York as well.
“There’s a myth about yoga being religious or for people who
are in shape or really flexible,” says Leigh. “There’s
nothing innately spiritual about putting your hands on the floor and stepping
your foot back. But yoga unlocks you so you can connect to whatever you
want, whether it’s spiritual or something else. It makes you better
at whatever you want to do. And it’s much more about integrity than
flexibility. It’s yoga practice, not ‘yoga perfect’,
not a show. It’s about where you are that day, not about whether
you can get your foot behind your head. Don’t let inflexibility
keep you from trying it out. There are some amazing teachers in this area,
and it’s a worthwhile exploration. It’s been transformational
for me.”
For information on classes, see www.chichesteryoga.com or call 688-9769.
Ready
To Changeover
Lisa Valvo
(O’Connor’s sister) presented the outgoing board with flowers,
including retiring district clerk Jeanne Shultis. Valvo thanked the board
for their service and asked the remaining members who voted in favor of
the five-through-eight middle school to convince the new board to continue
with the plan.
“May 20 was truly a sad day for this district,” Valvo said.
“The three of you did not deserve this modern day witch hunt of
a campaign your opponents ran against you.”
She went on to accuse the four newly elected board members of using fear,
emotion and confusion as a way to boost their platform to success.
Valvo then said that the transportation department is much safer than
it was on June 18, 2002, when O’Connor’s son, Kevin, was tragically
struck and killed by a school bus driver on Route 28. She thanked O’Connor
for personally seeing that the children are safer.
Donna White-Davis of Woodstock voiced the thoughts of many in attendance
offended by Valvo’s statements. She mentioned that it was the community
as a whole who rallied new transportation director Dave Moraca for change
to create a child safety zone, “When he wanted students to walk
a mile on the same street that Kevin was killed on. We had to push to
get people to make a decision to actually do something about the situation,”
Davis said. “I respect and love Cindy, I know she worked hard, I
loved Kevin, but to even paint the new members or this election with that
is really unfair.”
Parent Abbe Aronson, also angered over Valvo’s statements on the
election, said broader representation was a way to move forward.
“The more that certain members speak for certain communities, the
easier it is for other people to say ‘wow, thank goodness we all
got out and voted,’ because we need everyone’s representation
in this community,” she said.
O’Connor replied, “I would like to talk about transportation
because I don’t like what has developed in the past couple of months
and if anyone has anything to say about transportation, I have the right
to say it.”
She addressed comments made during the election that transportation was
not safe and the department did not need a director, but a head bus driver.
She called on Superintendent Leslie Ford, Assistant Superintendent for
Curriculum Victoria McLaren and Moraca to “educate the new board
on where we are and how far we have come.” She said it was time
for the new board members to learn the process and slow down their celebrations.
“For all of you that know me and my family, it has never been about
celebration and picnics or campaign jingles, it’s been about relearning
how to celebrate life when you are dealing with death,” O’Connor
said tearfully. “Six years ago on June 18, I watched my son die
before my very eyes, I watched him take his last breath due to complacency
and non compliance, so nobody can tell me about transportation.”
Also causing a small stir was the extension of Ford’s and McLaren’s
contracts through June 30, 2011. All voted in favor except for newly elected
board member Laurie Osmond, who abstained. She explained that their contracts
require the action, but wished the new board could make the decision in
six months time when they had time to process.
“I understand that if the extension does not happen it is the equivalent
of telling the superintendent that they should start looking for another
job and it should not be renewed and that is not a message I am comfortable
with,” she added.
School board trustee Maxanne Resnick, reading from a statement, gave more
detail, noting that some parents are not happy with Ford’s job performance.
“Not knowing the specific complaints, I recognize that there is
some dissatisfaction in the way both the superintendent and this board
has conducted business and that this dissatisfaction coalesced to change
the board composition,” she said, adding that by law, New York State
Superintendents must have a three-to-five year contract.
Ford is in the middle of her contract with specifications that it be reviewed
every December and June. She said the board has given Ford a positive
review but outlined areas of improvement that may fall in line with parents’
concerns.
In other business, longtime Director of Pupil Personnel Services Barbara
Boyce announced that she will retire affective October 1,2008. She received
flowers and a standing ovation for her services.
“It has been an honor and privilege and I have valued all these
years,” she said.
Also, the school board welcomed new Middle School principal Andrew Davenport,
who will begin July 1. He replaces Paul Schwartz, who resigned after one
year
|