Home - Editorial - POV - Masthead - Contact The Phoenicia Times

Letters to the Editor


Dear Editor,                                                                It's time for the Belleayre Mountain $10 lift ticket week from January 26-30! Tony Lanza and his staff have decided to create an all out Winter Festival in the villages surrounding the mountain! Phoenicia has been asked to create a Mardi Gras Celebration and Parade on Friday, January 30th! Belleayre is bringing the Belleayre Beast to rumble down Main Street and lead the parade! Party-goers can begin with drink specials and beads at Al‚ s Restaurant on the comer of Rts 28 & 214 from 5:30 on, with the parade beginning from the back parking lot at 7:30! The Rotary is building a float and everyone is encouraged to dress-up and join the parade!! Other fun stops in town that will be hosting Mardi Gras parties and having drink specials are the Woodland Valley Inn, Sportman‚s and Phoenicia Hotel!! Make the rounds in your costume and collect beads and win a prize for best costume! The Phoenicia Hotel and Cobblestone Motel are hosting the band, Captain Squeeze and the Zydeco Moshers at the Phoenicia Hotel from 8:OO pm!! Free beads with each drink purchase!! Our local restaurants are putting on fabulous special Cajun and Creole menus for the evening gala! For example, you‚ll find Seafood Gumbo at Mizuna Cafe; Shrimp Jambalaya, Pork Chop Etouuffe and Pecan Pie at the American Cafe; Red Snapper Creole, Oyster & Artichoke Soup at the new Woodland Valley Inn; and Cajun and Creole dishes at La Duchess Anne.
            Our shops will have specials and be open later than usual!
            The Belleayre Lodging Association is supporting the efforts with a donation towards decorations, with each establishment covering the extras! Our community can be very proud of how our businesses really get out there for the fun of all!                            See You There!
                                 Kimberly M. Wendt                              Phoenicia, NY

Dear Editor,
            Two and one half years ago I moved from NYC to West Hurley with my
husband, composer and percussionist David Van Tieghem, my 5 year old daughter and my mother, a retired writer and painter.  After moving, we discovered that in 1658 a great-great grandfather Jacob VanEtten came to Kingston and  founded  the Old Dutch Church. He must have loved the land as we do, coming all the way from Holland.  Discovering  this history gave me a sense of belonging and  pride in what has been preserved here. What if the Old Dutch Church had been blasted,  making  way for an asbestos filled office building in
the 60‚s?
            My husband and daughter  have asthma, so I wanted to get them out of NYC.  Although we live on busy Rt.28, it is manageable now,  and a good place to start my business, Woodstock Furniture Gallery. I make furniture out of antique wood, rescued from structures slated  for demolition, preserving history in hand-made pieces.
            As we shape the future of the Catskills, how do we want to live on this land, and present our area to visitors?  Where does the greatest tourism potential exist in the long run? Heritage tourism is the fastest growing sector of the tourism industry. The drama of historic hamlets, the mystery of original buildings and the facts and folk lore of roads dating back to  early days of settlement are everywhere in the Catskills, and are the kinds of places visitors want to explore.
            Initiatives, museums and sites exist to preserve and share the Catskills‚ heritage. The Federal Government  established the Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area, alocating 10 million dollars to protect and interpret the history of the valley, to encourage development respectful of this heritage.
            The National Trust for Historic Preservation  sees pilot programs carried out across America.  When communities tell stories of their  pasts,  the places that embody those stories are protected and history comes alive. The Travel Industry Association of America reports, cultural and historic tourists stay longer and spend more money than other types of travelers.
            The Belleayre resort would have an horrific effect. Clear-cutting 529 acres of high elevation will cause erosion, siltation of streams, flooding of homes and roads, destroing trout fishing and wildlife habitat.
            Barrons July 28th edition reads, "a glut of courses and a dearth of  players are ruining the economics of golf...the golf boom has fizzled unambiguously in the past few years and threatens to become a king-sized bust."   Pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and fertilizers from the golf course will be carried by wind and rain into ground and surface water.
            There is not enough water. Gitter acquired the Pine Hill Water Company,  seeking official sanction of the fragmentation of the system, and wants to secure Pine Hill‚s third water source for the resort. Despite numerous letters explaining that fragmentation places the system below minimum health standards, the DEC approved the permit modification.
            Belleayre will generate 500 vehicular trips per hour, thousands of trucks bringing  construction materials for 8 years.
            Our view of the night sky will be limited by lights of the mega-resort glowing over the area.
            Taxpayers will experience a 9% increase in property taxes, a $250,000 deficit, over-crowded schools, housing emergancies for  Belleayre employees, police, fire, road, and maintenance services will be overwhelmed and Gitter  admits he will offer only low paying jobs to
residents.
            It is still possible to preserve the beauty of our land, our wildlife, our history and our communities. We have control over the direction these issues take, if we take action now.
Cate Woodruff
West Hurley, NY

Dear Editor,
            It was with great interest that I attended the DEC sponsored public hearing at Margaretville Central School last Wednesday. I hoped to learn everything possible about the proposed Crossroads Project that is intended to be built in the towns of Middletown and Shandaken. There was a large attendance at both the afternoon and the evening sessions.
            Speaking for the project were a couple of Delaware County elected officials, the supervisor of Andes and the Delaware County Board of Supervisors‚ chairman. When I looked closely, I caught a slight twinkle in their eye that seemed to say increased tax revenue. I guess that if for any reason the project is denied its present proposed location, then they
can relocate to Andes or Harpersfield.
            There were a couple of local business people who spoke in favor of the project, but I suspect their motivation was more profits for their companies. The reason I suspect this is neither individual stated that their quality of life would be improved by this endeavor.
            There also were a few individuals in favor of Crossroads. It seemed to me that they either were employed by Crossroads or were just close friends of some of the people associated with the project. One individual stated that if the managing partner said it would be done right then they were sure that it would be so. This seems like a huge leap of faith to me.
            On the other side of the coin, there were individual after individual speaking on behalf of their respective entities. National and local Audubon Societies, Adirondack and local trail clubs, NYCDEP and many others. Each and every speaker raised real concerns about the validity of the Environmental Impact Statement and the Crossroads Project. These individuals represented thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of members of their organizations.
            Many individual speakers from the affected communities spoke well into the night. These community members spoke with passion and concern. Their concerns ran the entire gamut right down to an aphid which is destroying hemlock timber and may be accelerated by the clear cutting necessary for this project.
            There were a few serious questions queried toward the NYS DEC itself. Why did they declare the DEIS complete and distribute it just before Christmas? One argued that there was not enough time for people to review a 3,500 page document and formulate questions even without the holiday in the mix. Another asked why the public hearings were scheduled in the middle of the week in the middle of January when our weekend visitors could not be present. Still another asked how the NYS DEC could be the lead review agency when in fact it is currently involved in the expansion of its own Belleayre ski facility. Belleayre is in the middle of the proposed project and can only benefit from implementation of Crossroads.
            Out of the multitude of speakers, I did not hear one person that requested that this project should be constructed so that they could 1 have one of the 700-plus $6 to $8 I per hour jobs that it will generate.
            As I drove home that evening something occurred to me. The people representing the project were the ones with the power and money. The opposition to this project was the little guy, "we the people," the quiet majority. Time after time, power and money have beaten down the huddled masses. 
            Make no mistake, this was just a skirmish, the battle for victory for either group remains a long and cumbersome task. Be assured that there will be no winner at the end of this conflict, but only a community torn apart within itself. And what for? Why, for power and money, what else?
Jerry A. Fairbairn,
Margaretville, NY

Dear Editor,
            I have been a visitor to this area for 45 years and a homeowner for 13.  My relatives built businesses here and were longtime members of the community since the 1940‚s.
            I am concerned about the Bellayre Resort for numerous reasons, but mostly on the quality of life, my family and our future.
            The sheer magnitude of this project boggles the mind.  Cutting 400 acres of Catskill Park woodland to build a golf course is irresponsible at best.  Golf courses are notoriously toxic and the runoff will most likely compromise New York City‚s water quality.
            But clearly I am concerned about the length of construction, the safety of the highways and the negative impact on this area.  I love where I live in Shandaken, it is like no where else.  I have seen the lack of zoning in the Blue Ridge mountains.  Pegeion Forge, for example, is a nightmare of development.  I will never go there again.  We know that Bellayre Mountain is family friendly and has been expanded without massive over commercialization.  Having seen the cross roads plans, I know that the personal touch which is so endemic to this area, will be "forever lost", rather than "forever wild". 
            But let me speak to the real issue here, and my area of expertise, politics.  As a veteran legislative director, I became involved in this issue as a homeowner several years ago quite by accident.  I picked up a local newspaper and then started asking questions. Questions in Shandaken, questions in Albany, Questions in New York City.  Questions of local, state and national elected officials.  It became apparent to me that Crossroads were influencing the process.  However, this process, I came to learn was one sided.  The people in Shandaken hadn‚t been heard from.  Consultants, lobbyists and lawyers were hard charging elected officials in the State Capital.  As a private citizen I became alarmed.
            For the past several years Cross Road Ventures have made contributions to the community here in Shandaken.  Catskill Corners, The Emerson Spa Motel, and support of the Bellayre music festivals are all admirable.  They are attempting to be businessmen and good neighbors.  These efforts are laudable.  They are small businesses in character with our area.  However the golf project isn‚t.  Cross Roads has spent a great deal of time and money sending monthly advocacy newsletters to residents.  In July 2002, a newsletter entitled "Full Disclosure", was used to neutralize a local newspaper editor who opposed the golf course.  Cross Roads didn‚t disclose, however, their massive efforts to influence elections and government, through powerful law firms, lobbyists and public relations at all levels of government.  The hard working people of Shandaken, however, don‚t have such resources and have chosen to live in an area that is devoid of urban sprawl.
            I am not against development.  But we aren‚t talking about  Urban Renewal or a jobs program here.  We are speaking of one of Gods precious gifts to man and our stewardship over it.  Our land, our water, and our safety.
            Governor Pataki recognizes the importance of this stewardship.  As an observer of the 2004 State of the State address on January 7, 2004 (in Albany), the Governor in his wisdom said "Our environment, like our freedom, is inherited from our ancestors and borrowed from our children.  Both are given to us in the trust that they will be preserved and improved for the next generation."
            "Together we've worked hard from that trust.  Theodore Roosevelt once observed that the nation behaves well if it treats the natural resources as assets which it must turn over to the next generation increased, and not impaired, in value!"
            I embrace these words.  Once we develop these lands, there is no turning back.  I applaud the Governor for his stance and implore the D.E.C. to embrace the tradition, values and sanctity of our Catskill home that we have labored to preserve for generations.  Thank you.
Dan Wray
Shandaken, NY 

Dear Editor,
            Having attended much of the public hearings that took place at Onteora High School on the Belleayre Resort Project, I would like to make the following observations: the unruly, uncivil and just plain rude behavior of resort opponents at the hearing toward anyone who cared to speak in favor of the project was a disgrace. After all, who in their right mind feels the least bit comfortable or even safe speaking in favor of something that is opposed by a crowd of booing, hissing, and threatening people. As a result, a number of people who I know came out to speak in favor of the project left the meeting early in disgust. Free speech is a precious right but not when it is used to abuse, intimidate or otherwise deter others from exercising their right to free speech.
            Give the resort opponents their full due. They were well organized, packed the hall with people from all over the Northeast, and they mostly all spoke from the same script (even if they didn‚t know what town they were in).
            Predictably much of the press from around our area has chosen to characterize resort supporters as mainly area business people and resort opponents as the "local community" as if none of "us locals" had a positive thought about this project coming to Shandaken.
            As I left the meeting that night I stopped briefly to inquire about a fellow who was busy handing out anti-resort placards and who appeared to be coaching anti-resort speakers on what to say. I was told his name is Eric Goldstein, a big cheese lawyer working for the natural Resources Defense Council out of New York City. This is the same group who refused to support the 1997 Watershed Agreement signed between the upstate towns and NYC because the agreement didn't go far enough in restricting development in the watershed.
            This is the same guy who last year petitioned New York City to remove another 25 percent of watershed lands from any future development.
            It would appear that Goldstein and his pals would really like nothing better than to see all of us pesky little people who now populate the region to simply go away. As they probably see it, what better way to safeguard NYC‚s drinking water than to make it virtually impossible for us to build anything now in our town that would add to the town‚s tax base, help lower our taxes, create jobs or attract tourists to come and support our local economy.
            I would like to believe otherwise, but if history is any guide, over the past 100 years NYC has succeeded in driving out thousands of local residents to make way for the reservoirs. Now with the help and support of groups like the NRDC, it appears that NYC is determined to drive out those of us who dared to remain.
            That's the message that seemed clear after last week's hearing.
Alfred Higley
Mt. Tremper, NY

Dear Editor,
            If there are any doubts as to why we don't need ANOTHER hotel, golf course, restaurant, parking lot, thousand toilets, hundred tons of garbage, sewage, pesticides and pollutants, etc. etc. all emanating from the proposed "Belleayre Resort", all one need do is take a short drive over to the "illustrious" Concord Hotel and check out the surrounding town of Monticello to see the impact the Concord has had on that town. Or, try the "lovely" Nevele Hotel in Ellenville to gauge just what a resort hotel can do to a community.
            Better yet, take a drive to Atlantic City and visit the glorious, magnificent hotels on the boardwalk, but avoid the surrounding slums that were supposed to benefit from these cash cows.
            Right now there are plenty of hotels and golf courses in the Catskills, all of which are underused and of NO benefit to their communities. The only benefit they serve is to enrich their developers.
            Make no mistake; Dean Gitter  (Crossroad Ventures) is a real estate "developer" (see: Donald Trump). Okay, he's a peanut compared to Trump, but their goals are the same. Mr. Gitter is NOT an altruist. He is NOT interested in improving the lives of anyone in Shandaken or Middletown, with the exception of himself, his cronies, and his supporters. The proposed Belleayre Resort has one purpose, and one purpose ONLY, and that is to line the pockets of Mr. Gitter and company, to make him richer than he is already.  By the way, there‚s nothing wrong with being rich, just in the way it‚s achieved. When it‚s at the expense of others and the environment, it is unconscionable.
            We are extremely fortunate to be living in a "forest preserve"  (Forest: as defined in Webster‚s dictionary; "A wood of native growth; A tract of woodland which has NEVER been cultivated") NOT a "resort, country club, or CONDO preserve". You want condos and country clubs- the Hamptons is an ideal choice. You want forest, natural beauty, clean air, pesticide-free land and water.choose the Catskill Forest Preserve, as it exists NOW.
            Dean Gitter is not a Catskill native. Ironic, since he blasts the opponents of his Belleayre Resort as being "outsiders". Yet, he professes to "know what's best" for this community. As a further insult to the community, he selects friends who are also "outsiders" to serve on his "development" team: Richard B. Fisher, formerly of Morgan Stanley, now a senior advisor to Investcorp (one of the largest real estate developers in the world) and Kenneth D. Pasternak, CEO of the Knight/Trimark Group, both also NOT Catskill natives, to build this monstrosity so out-of-sync with the environment. Hello Dean∑if this project is supposed to create jobs for locals, why are you hiring non-locals for the top spots? Let‚s get some local input on this travesty.
            We all agree our area could use a financial "shot in the arm". However, a project of this size and scope is ridiculous. Our fragile environment and eco-system cannot accommodate something of this magnitude. I‚m sure, if we all search our hearts and our minds, instead of being swayed by the dollar signs dangled before our eyes, there‚s a compromise somewhere to be had. None of us wants to leave behind a legacy of concrete and steel where there used to be a mountain.
            Joni Mitchell put it so aptly: ".don't it always seem to go that you don‚t know what you‚ve got Œtil it‚s gone∑..THEY paved paradise and put up a parking lot∑.
Carol Shalaew
Phoenicia, NY

Dear Editor,
            As much as the environmentally-minded don't want this resort,  unfortunately they will get either it or the equivalent in a multitude of pint-size pollutors across the region.  Witness the situation in Fleischmanns, where long-term local residents have largely squared off against newcomers and part-timers to allow illegal junkyards to mushroom along streams feeding into the Pepacton.
            The problem is that there is a lot of pressure felt by local populations for economic development, and if they don't get it from a Crossroads, they will turn to less conspicuous but equally-damaging alternatives. In a way this is worse, because it not only degrades the environment but compromises public officials who would allow activity to take place that is illegal under the  Memorandum of Agreement. The DEP, which in the case of Fleischmanns has acquitted itself as the flaccid member of the NYC water bureaucracy, would be no threat to this type of  development.
            The clear-cutting of 500-plus acres of forest sickens me, but so does the prospect of  various local politicians who, with outstretched palms, will pollute and destroy the environment anyway, under the pretext of delivering more jobs to their constituents.
 Vicky Szerko
Fleischmanns, NY 

Dear Editor,                                                                Your January 15th editorial "What If" raises troubling questions for Shandaken residents about casino gambling in our town. Although the Belleayre Resort developer has publicly opposed bringing gambling here, he intends to sell the permits for the project, should they be granted, to a major resort operator.
            The "major resort operator" would likely be a corporation primarily responsible to its shareholders, who would want to make a profit. The proposed resort presents an appetizing site for a casino. New York City is only 125 miles away; a resort would be already built with 1200 bedrooms, 2 golf courses and a ski area. To provide a comparison, the Foxwoods Casino in Connecticut is only slightly larger with 1400 bedrooms, 2 golf courses and no ski area.                                                                        An agreement is already in place by the governor to site a casino in Ulster County .Our county legislature has made an agreement with an Oklahoma Indian tribe regarding casino gambling; the agreement includes a clause requiring any town in the county to receive the casino, if chosen for the site.                                                       The social and economic effects of the explosion of legalized gambling in our country have been widely documented, although less widely disseminated. A few relevant facts taken from the National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling (www.ncalq.orq):                                                   -Half of casino revenues come from problem or compulsive gamblers .5% of Americans (15 million) have a serious gambling problem
            -Within 50 miles of a gaming facility, the rate of gambling addiction jumps to 15% .Local rates of personal bankruptcy, crime, depression and suicide increase where gambling is introduced on a large scale
            -Cost-benefit studies show that casinos require $3 of additional tax revenue to cover local costs of social services for every dollar of new tax revenue that the state receives                                                          I have a relative who cannot stop betting on the horses. He recently convinced his 90-year-old mother to sign a large home-improvement loan on their residence, but sadly a lot of that money is going to support his gambling addiction.                      The belief that a big influx of gambling money will bring increased happiness has not proved true for other communities. I hope people in our town will look carefully at these issues before supporting a major resort operator in getting their foot in the door.
Sincerely,                                                                                                       Frank Fallon                                            Mt. Tremper, NY

Dear Editor,
            On behalf of the planning board of the Town of Shandaken, I would like to thank Lynn Davidson for her five years of service as a member of the planning board. Lynn served as vice chair and also participated as a representative of the planning board on the comprehensive plan committee. The number of hours she spent as a volunteer serving the Town of Shandaken is inestimable and she deserves a hearty round of applause.                                              Bethia Waterman, chair                            Shandaken Planning Board

Dear Editor,
            I am in agreement with and support Edna Hoyt's position that Jane Todd is in a conflict of interest being on the Town Board and being a member of the Sharp Committee. I had this opinion before Edna made it an issue when I heard Sharp had awarded a grant to the Phoenicia Hotel and then I saw Jane Todd‚s name displayed on the side of the hotel as well as the Shandaken Republican Headquarters. The question that begs to be asked is, is there any quid pro quo, (something for something) here?
            When I worked in procurement at IBM it was essential that we, "not even have the appearance of impropriety." Jane Todd wearing her two hats does not meet that criteria. What does it mean when Mrs. Todd states, "I went to the US Office of special Council and got a determination that I am not prohibited from...holding public office." That answer sounds too general and what does it mean, "I went to...?"
Robert Jacobson
                               Mount Tremper, NY                                                                  
Dear Editor,                                                                Re:  "Erosion eroded" article, last issue, about the project to restore the Esopus stream bank at Woodland Valley.                   In addition to those mentioned that were instrumental to the project,  others should be included.  Gary Capella and staff of UCSWCD worked on the project from day one, integral to the team. Thank you to Gary, Cathy, Quentin, Jake and all the staff at UCSWCD. Secondly,  Harry Jameson,  the Town Tinker, provided on site assistance, and finally thanks to Bruce Duffy and Trout Unlimited, for their continued support.                                                                    From all the neighbors on the stream, Thank you!                                                                               Michelle Spark                                                Phoenicia, NY
Dear Editor,                                                                Last year things in the valley seemed to be good.  Nature stirred in her normal rhythms.  Spring brought the profusion of white-flowered shadblow that always decorates the otherwise barren banks of the brook; they herald the awakening trout.  In May the wild azaleas burst forth in their delicate pinks and whites, soon to be followed by the simple, yet in the same breath complex, blossoms of mountain laurel. Millions of wild strawberries, whose runners had cleverly insinuated themselves throughout the valley's game trails and sandy corridor, bloomed their tiny flowers and set fruit.  The old apple trees, stubborn survivors of nineteenth century orchards, brought forth fruit in their tenacious manner that would eventually nurture the deer and prompt bears to climb up and shake their venerable branches in late summer. Wild turkeys would peck at the drops.                                                                         We stocked the brook for fly-fishing and then stocked it again.  The accommodating rains kept the streams full and the fishing was, for once, almost always good.                                                                                We held our parties at the old Inn, ate our beefsteak in the manner of the Millers˜rare, sliced thin, rolled in hot melted creamery butter and laid on slices of fresh bread, all on a platter.  We danced the old dances˜Alabama Jubilee, Catskill Mountain Stomp, Virginia Reel, Red Wing, and the rest.                                                                        But things were not good at all. Trudi Miller was dying.                                                               The inscription in an old book given to her as a child tells something.  On the flyleaf of The Young Folks' Cyclopaedia of COMMON THINGS (copyright 1885) are the words:                                                                     Miss Trudi Clare Miller                                                  from                                                     Dr. Gertrude G. Mack                                                  September 1947                                           The bright-eyed precocious only child of Paul and Alice Miller, she was the golden girl of our valley. It was not a stretch for Doctor Mack to expect Miss Miller, age six, to be able to read and understand the quaint yet instructional, alphabetically arranged "Cyclopaedia" from her grandfather's era.  TRIANGLE, TROMBONE, TROUT˜ah, trout:                                           ...Trout are caught with the rod and line, and may be fished for in several ways, and with several kinds of bait.  In fly-fishing the bait is a common fly, grasshopper, cricket, or some other live insect, or a fly made by hand.  The rod should be ten or twelve feet long, and should have a reel with about fifty yards of fine silk, grass, or hair line wound on it.  The line in use should be about half as long again as the rod.  The fisherman must learn to throw this so that the fly will fall lightly on the water, the fly first and the line afterward.                                        Trudi grew up in the ancestral slabsided house that her grandfather had built on the lip of Panther Mountain, overlooking Woodland Brook.  As a callow youth, I thought that such a country life must have been heaven for Trudi˜to be so close to that lovely trout stream, surrounded by those mountains 365 days a year.  But of course, such a confinement must have galled her to an extent.  Soon enough she found a way for her brain-power, her beauty-power (for she was lovely), her Trudi-power to propel her from Boiceville's Onteora High School to Cornell.  Then on to Chapel Hill for a doctorate in political science.  And so forth and so on.  Program officer at the National Science Foundation, Visiting Scholar at the Brookings Institute, teacher at major universities, author.                                                          Her life was an adventure that took her many places, but eventually the draw of the valley brought her back.  She settled in with her husband Jim Infante, and feathered her deceased Uncle Phil's cabin nest˜Green Gables.  There they lived, in a contentment of love and an accommodation to each other's frailties, surrounded by the forest places of her childhood, and next to neighbors who'd known her since the very first.
Then, this season of cancer, and the hope and wish and prayer that the medicos could work one of their potential miracles of a Sloan-Kettering nature.                                          In late September my nephew caught a nice batch of trout and I brought some down to Trudi and Jim˜since fresh trout has ever been a favorite meal of anyone named Miller. She could not face the thought of eating them, and sent them and me back up the mountain; she called them precious˜trout too precious to waste. And I thought, "Not as precious as you Trudi," and finally admitted to myself how very very sick she was.  She died six days later.                    There is a strain of wild azalea on the old Miller property and at Green Gables˜Pinxter (Rhododendron periclymenoides)˜admirable for its beauty and resilience to a harsh climate. In spring it sets an abundance of delicate pink flowers that waft a heady perfume not soon forgotten by bee or mortal man. Trudi's father Paul once said, when comparing them to hybrid azaleas of the gaudy sexless type marketed at garden centers, "Those fancy ones aren't worth the powder it'd take to blow them up."  A portion of Trudi's ashes now fertilize her beloved Pinxters.  How very like them she was.                          Now, how this homage to Trudi relates to the coarse underlying intention of this letter (a begging for alms to help us stock Woodland Brook this year), I do not know.  Perhaps you can find a connection. I felt compelled to make this Trudi's letter, and that's that.  At any rate, I ask that if you can help with the stocking of brown trout for the fly-fishing section of the Brook, that you make out a check to the WOODLAND TROUT FUND, and send it to me:                                                                                                                 Mike O'Neil                                      101 Rambling Road                                        Vernon, CT 06066
Dear Editor,
            No public official always likes what gets reported in the press, and it's unfortunate that town board member Jane Todd views our news coverage as skewed to reflect negatively on her. We have no such intention nor do we believe that‚s true.
            Last October the Catskill Mountain News and The Phoenicia Times ran a letter-to-the-editor in which one Shandaken town board member raised three separate conflict-of-interest issues concerning another. Two months later, the writer, Edna Hoyt, sent us another letter - one she‚d received -  notifying her of her immanent dismissal from the board of  the SHARP Committee, whose director is another town board member, Jane Todd. Lonnie and Ruth Gale, SHARP‚s two founding board members, resigned in protest over what they saw as the political nature of Hoyt‚s forced resignation.
            Since Todd and SHARP President Ernest Gardner both used the term "libel" with respect to Hoyt‚s letter, I went back and read it very carefully. The letter had strong opinions but  said nothing potentially libelous. Libel is a legal term with a number of very specific criteria, including the knowledge that what is said is intentionally false. It's almost impossible to substantiate, especially for an elected public official who are all but exempted from bringing such claims.  And while our courts have made it clear they're not in the business of determining what's true and what isn't, they've also consistently supported everyone‚s right to voice their personal opinions. In a small town, in any town, the events above were news and we reported them because that's our job.
            Ms. Todd's response to the story was a letter accusing me of "spreading malicious lies and distortion" about her because I quoted Hoyt.  Edna Hoyt was quoted accurately, Lonny Gale was quoted accurately, and Jane Todd was quoted accurately. In fact I called Todd back a second time, to make sure she fully understood what Hoyt and Gale had said, so that her response could be as direct and appropriate as possible. The story did contain one small factual error that I do apologize for: I wasn't aware that Joan Munster's employment with SHARP had recently ended.  Apart from that, there were no inaccuracies, distortions, or errors of any kind concerning Ms. Todd or her family. As for her "correction" on SHARP‚s board composition, there was no error: Exactly as reported, there were, until recently, six SHARP board members from Shandaken.
            On the substantive question involved, Hoyt‚s letter raised the ethical issue of Todd‚s potential conflict-of-interests, not the legal issue of whether under federal law, her two positions constitute a violation of the Hatch Act. But since most of the money that passes through SHARP is not federally administered, that determination has little relevance with respect to any administration of non-federal grant funds. And it has no relevance with respect to the other conflict-of-interest issues Hoyt raised: Todd‚s actions in 2000 regarding the Pine Hill Water Company and her land purchase in Big Indian. Although Todd may feel she has adequately addressed the later, neither issue is in my view resolved. In fact they now appear to be exacerbated by a citizen‚s group having formally asked for Todd‚s recusal from issues connected with the Belleayre Resort on the basis of the land purchase. Because the town board majority understands these are problematic issues, they‚ve come up with a partial solution, the creation of a town Ethics Committee. Although Shandaken‚s long managed without one, I think there‚s a likely reason the new board majority requires one now: to rule, as needed, that nothing Jane Todd has ever done may have violated Shandaken's conflict-of-interest statutes. 
            In my view, faulting a newspaper or its publisher for reporting the news and quoting its sources accurately is not an appropriate response to a story one may not like. I also think it is unreasonable to attribute views expressed in letters-to-the-editor to the newspapers in which they are published. I think it‚s positive Ms. Todd chose to address some of the issues raised in Hoyt‚s letter; that‚s what public dialogue IS. Providing a forum for that is a vital part of the role newspapers play, especially when all views are permitted to run without comment, as we run them.
            Finally with respect to "the truth" as Ms. Todd appears to lay claim to it, I do find it odd that she says she performs her duties as a grant administrator "at no cost to the taxpayers." Everything she does in her capacity as a paid grantwriter and administrator is paid by taxpayer dollars. They're just not all dollars that are paid solely by Shandaken's taxpayers.
Brian Powers
Publisher, The Phoenicia Times